linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: yinghan@google.com, aquini@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	mhocko@suse.cz, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH -mm -v2 4/4] mm,vmscan: evict inactive file pages first
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:38:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120816113805.5ae65af0@cuia.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120816113450.52f4e633@cuia.bos.redhat.com>

When a lot of streaming file IO is happening, it makes sense to
evict just the inactive file pages and leave the other LRU lists
alone.

Likewise, when driving a cgroup hierarchy into its hard limit,
or over its soft limit, it makes sense to pick a child cgroup
that has lots of inactive file pages, and evict those first.

Being over its soft limit is considered a stronger preference
than just having a lot of inactive file pages, so a well behaved
cgroup is allowed to keep its file cache when there is a "badly
behaving" one in the same hierarchy.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 769fdcd..2884b4f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1576,6 +1576,19 @@ static int inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
 		return inactive_anon_is_low(lruvec);
 }
 
+/* If this lruvec has lots of inactive file pages, reclaim those only. */
+static bool reclaim_file_only(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
+			      unsigned long anon, unsigned long file)
+{
+	if (inactive_file_is_low(lruvec))
+		return false;
+
+	if (file > (anon + file) >> sc->priority)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 				 struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
@@ -1658,6 +1671,14 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* Lots of inactive file pages? Reclaim those only. */
+	if (reclaim_file_only(lruvec, sc, anon, file)) {
+		fraction[0] = 0;
+		fraction[1] = 1;
+		denominator = 1;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * With swappiness at 100, anonymous and file have the same priority.
 	 * This scanning priority is essentially the inverse of IO cost.
@@ -1922,8 +1943,8 @@ static void age_recent_pressure(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct zone *zone)
  * should always be larger than recent_rotated, and the size should
  * always be larger than recent_pressure.
  */
-static u64 reclaim_score(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
-			 struct lruvec *lruvec)
+static u64 reclaim_score(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct lruvec *lruvec,
+			 struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
 	u64 anon, file;
@@ -1949,6 +1970,14 @@ static u64 reclaim_score(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		anon *= 10000;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Prefer reclaiming from an lruvec with lots of inactive file
+	 * pages. Once those have been reclaimed, the score will drop so
+	 * far we will pick another lruvec to reclaim from.
+	 */
+	if (reclaim_file_only(lruvec, sc, anon, file))
+		file *= 100;
+
 	return max(anon, file);
 }
 
@@ -1977,7 +2006,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
 
 		age_recent_pressure(lruvec, zone);
 
-		score = reclaim_score(memcg, lruvec);
+		score = reclaim_score(memcg, lruvec, sc);
 
 		/* Pick the lruvec with the highest score. */
 		if (score > max_score) {
@@ -2002,7 +2031,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
 	 */
 	do {
 		shrink_lruvec(victim_lruvec, sc);
-		score = reclaim_score(memcg, victim_lruvec);
+		score = reclaim_score(memcg, victim_lruvec, sc);
 	} while (sc->nr_to_reclaim > 0 && score > max_score / 2);
 
 	mem_cgroup_put(victim_memcg);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-16 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-16 15:34 [RFC][PATCH -mm -v2 0/4] mm,vmscan: reclaim from highest score cgroup Rik van Riel
2012-08-16 15:35 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm -v2 1/4] mm,vmscan: track recent pressure on each LRU set Rik van Riel
2012-08-16 15:36 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm -v2 2/4] mm,memcontrol: export mem_cgroup_get/put Rik van Riel
2012-08-16 15:37 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm -v2 3/4] mm,vmscan: reclaim from the highest score cgroups Rik van Riel
2012-08-17 23:34   ` Ying Han
2012-08-17 23:41     ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-18  0:26       ` Ying Han
2012-08-18  4:02         ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-16 15:38 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2012-08-23 23:07   ` [RFC][PATCH -mm -v2 4/4] mm,vmscan: evict inactive file pages first Ying Han
2012-08-24  3:00     ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120816113805.5ae65af0@cuia.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).