From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] memcg: disable kmem code when not in use.
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:02:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120817070241.GA18600@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344517279-30646-9-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
On Thu 09-08-12 17:01:16, Glauber Costa wrote:
> We can use jump labels to patch the code in or out when not used.
>
> Because the assignment: memcg->kmem_accounted = true is done after the
> jump labels increment, we guarantee that the root memcg will always be
> selected until all call sites are patched (see memcg_kmem_enabled).
Not that it would be really important because kmem_accounted goes away
in a subsequent patch but I think the wording is a bit misleading here.
First of all there is no guanratee that kmem_accounted=true is seen
before atomic_inc(&key->enabled) because there is no memory barrier and
the lock serves just a leave barrier. But I do not think this is
important at all because key->enabled is what matters here. Even if
memcg_kmem_enabled is true we do not consider it if the key is disabled,
right?
> This guarantees that no mischarges are applied.
>
> Jump label decrement happens when the last reference count from the
> memcg dies. This will only happen when the caches are all dead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
> Acked-by: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> CC: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Anyway the code looks correct.
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 5 ++++-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 75b247e..f39d933 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/cgroup.h>
> #include <linux/vm_event_item.h>
> #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
>
> struct mem_cgroup;
> struct page_cgroup;
> @@ -401,7 +402,9 @@ struct sock;
> void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk);
> void sock_release_memcg(struct sock *sk);
>
> -#define memcg_kmem_on 1
> +extern struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
> +#define memcg_kmem_on static_key_false(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key)
> +
> bool __memcg_kmem_new_page(gfp_t gfp, void *handle, int order);
> void __memcg_kmem_commit_page(struct page *page, void *handle, int order);
> void __memcg_kmem_free_page(struct page *page, int order);
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index e9824c1..3216292 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *s)
> #include <net/sock.h>
> #include <net/ip.h>
>
> +struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
> +/* so modules can inline the checks */
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
> +
> static bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> static int memcg_charge_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp, s64 delta);
> static void memcg_uncharge_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, s64 delta);
> @@ -607,6 +611,16 @@ void __memcg_kmem_free_page(struct page *page, int order)
> mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcg_kmem_free_page);
> +
> +static void disarm_kmem_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + if (memcg->kmem_accounted)
> + static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
> +}
> +#else
> +static void disarm_kmem_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_INET) && defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM)
> @@ -622,6 +636,12 @@ static void disarm_sock_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static void disarm_static_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + disarm_sock_keys(memcg);
> + disarm_kmem_keys(memcg);
> +}
> +
> static void drain_all_stock_async(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>
> static struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *
> @@ -4147,6 +4167,24 @@ static ssize_t mem_cgroup_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> len = scnprintf(str, sizeof(str), "%llu\n", (unsigned long long)val);
> return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, nbytes, ppos, str, len);
> }
> +
> +static void memcg_update_kmem_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, u64 val)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> + /*
> + * Once enabled, can't be disabled. We could in theory disable it if we
> + * haven't yet created any caches, or if we can shrink them all to
> + * death. But it is not worth the trouble.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
> + if (!memcg->kmem_accounted && val != RESOURCE_MAX) {
> + static_key_slow_inc(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
> + memcg->kmem_accounted = true;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The user of this function is...
> * RES_LIMIT.
> @@ -4184,15 +4222,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_write(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->kmem, val);
> if (ret)
> break;
> - /*
> - * Once enabled, can't be disabled. We could in theory
> - * disable it if we haven't yet created any caches, or
> - * if we can shrink them all to death.
> - *
> - * But it is not worth the trouble
> - */
> - if (!memcg->kmem_accounted && val != RESOURCE_MAX)
> - memcg->kmem_accounted = true;
> + memcg_update_kmem_limit(memcg, val);
> } else
> return -EINVAL;
> break;
> @@ -5054,7 +5084,7 @@ static void free_work(struct work_struct *work)
> * to move this code around, and make sure it is outside
> * the cgroup_lock.
> */
> - disarm_sock_keys(memcg);
> + disarm_static_keys(memcg);
> if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
> kfree(memcg);
> else
> --
> 1.7.11.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 135+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-09 13:01 [PATCH v2 00/11] Request for Inclusion: kmem controller for memcg Glauber Costa
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] memcg: Make it possible to use the stock for more than one page Glauber Costa
2012-08-10 15:12 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed Glauber Costa
2012-08-10 15:42 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-10 16:49 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-10 17:28 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-10 17:56 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-10 17:30 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-10 18:52 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-10 18:54 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-13 8:05 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-13 13:10 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] memcg: change defines to an enum Glauber Costa
2012-08-10 15:43 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] kmem accounting basic infrastructure Glauber Costa
2012-08-10 17:02 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-13 8:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-17 2:38 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-14 16:21 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-15 9:33 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 11:12 ` James Bottomley
2012-08-15 12:55 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-15 13:29 ` James Bottomley
2012-08-15 12:39 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-15 12:53 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 13:02 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-15 13:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 13:26 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-15 13:31 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 14:10 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-15 14:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 14:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-08-15 15:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 15:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-08-15 15:35 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-08-15 18:11 ` Ying Han
2012-08-15 18:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-08-15 19:22 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 18:07 ` Ying Han
2012-08-15 15:19 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-15 15:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-08-15 18:01 ` Ying Han
2012-08-15 18:00 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 19:50 ` Ying Han
2012-08-16 15:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-17 5:58 ` Ying Han
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] Add a __GFP_KMEMCG flag Glauber Costa
2012-08-10 17:07 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] memcg: kmem controller infrastructure Glauber Costa
2012-08-10 17:27 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-13 8:28 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-14 18:58 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-15 9:18 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 16:38 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-15 17:00 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 17:12 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-15 19:31 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-16 3:37 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-16 7:47 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-20 13:36 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-20 15:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-17 2:36 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-17 7:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-14 11:00 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-11 5:11 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-13 8:07 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-13 9:59 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-13 21:21 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-14 17:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-15 9:42 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 10:44 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 13:09 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-15 14:01 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 14:23 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-15 14:27 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-16 9:53 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-16 9:57 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-16 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-16 15:22 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-21 21:50 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-22 8:35 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-23 0:07 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-23 7:51 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] mm: Allocate kernel pages to the right memcg Glauber Costa
2012-08-09 16:33 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-09 16:42 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-10 17:33 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-13 8:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-13 8:57 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-10 17:36 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-13 8:02 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-14 15:16 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-15 9:08 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 13:22 ` Mel Gorman
2012-08-15 13:39 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 13:51 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-15 9:24 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] memcg: disable kmem code when not in use Glauber Costa
2012-08-17 7:02 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2012-08-17 7:01 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-17 8:04 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] memcg: propagate kmem limiting information to children Glauber Costa
2012-08-10 17:51 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-13 8:01 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-17 9:00 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-17 9:15 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-17 9:35 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-17 10:07 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-17 10:35 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-17 10:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-21 7:54 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-21 8:35 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-21 9:17 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-21 9:22 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-21 10:00 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-21 10:01 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-22 1:09 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-22 8:22 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-22 23:23 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-23 7:55 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-24 5:06 ` Greg Thelen
2012-08-24 5:23 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-17 10:39 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] memcg: allow a memcg with kmem charges to be destructed Glauber Costa
2012-08-21 8:22 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-22 8:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-09 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] protect architectures where THREAD_SIZE >= PAGE_SIZE against fork bombs Glauber Costa
2012-08-10 17:54 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-08-21 9:35 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-21 9:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-21 10:57 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-17 21:37 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Request for Inclusion: kmem controller for memcg Ying Han
2012-08-20 7:51 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120817070241.GA18600@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).