From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>,
"fengguang.wu@intel.com" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v4]swap: add a simple random read swapin detection
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:03:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120903220332.GA1997@barrios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120903114631.GA5410@kernel.org>
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 07:46:31PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:32:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Don't we need initialization?
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index 0f3b7cd..c0f3221 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -416,6 +416,9 @@ static void anon_vma_ctor(void *data)
> >
> > mutex_init(&anon_vma->mutex);
> > atomic_set(&anon_vma->refcount, 0);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> > + atomic_set(&anon_vma->swapra_miss, 0);
> > +#endif
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&anon_vma->head);
> > }
>
> Sorry about this silly problem. I'm wondering why I didn't notice it, maybe
> because only tested random swap after move swapra_miss to anon_vma.
>
>
> Subject: swap: add a simple random read swapin detection
>
> The swapin readahead does a blind readahead regardless if the swapin is
> sequential. This is ok for harddisk and random read, because read big size has
> no penality in harddisk, and if the readahead pages are garbage, they can be
> reclaimed fastly. But for SSD, big size read is more expensive than small size
> read. If readahead pages are garbage, such readahead only has overhead.
>
> This patch addes a simple random read detection like what file mmap readahead
> does. If random read is detected, swapin readahead will be skipped. This
> improves a lot for a swap workload with random IO in a fast SSD.
>
> I run anonymous mmap write micro benchmark, which will triger swapin/swapout.
> runtime changes with path
> randwrite harddisk -38.7%
> seqwrite harddisk -1.1%
> randwrite SSD -46.9%
> seqwrite SSD +0.3%
>
> For both harddisk and SSD, the randwrite swap workload run time is reduced
> significant. sequential write swap workload hasn't chanage.
>
> Interesting is the randwrite harddisk test is improved too. This might be
> because swapin readahead need allocate extra memory, which further tights
> memory pressure, so more swapout/swapin.
>
> This patch depends on readahead-fault-retry-breaks-mmap-file-read-random-detection.patch
>
> V2->V3:
> move swapra_miss to 'struct anon_vma' as suggested by Konstantin.
>
> V1->V2:
> 1. Move the swap readahead accounting to separate functions as suggested by Riel.
> 2. Enable the logic only with CONFIG_SWAP enabled as suggested by Minchan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-03 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-27 4:00 [patch v2]swap: add a simple random read swapin detection Shaohua Li
2012-08-27 12:57 ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-27 14:52 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-08-30 10:36 ` [patch v3]swap: " Shaohua Li
2012-08-30 16:03 ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-30 17:42 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-03 7:21 ` [patch v4]swap: " Shaohua Li
2012-09-03 8:32 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-03 11:46 ` Shaohua Li
2012-09-03 19:02 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-09-03 19:05 ` Rik van Riel
2012-09-04 7:34 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-09-04 14:15 ` Rik van Riel
2012-09-06 11:08 ` [PATCH RFC] mm/swap: automatic tuning for swapin readahead Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-10-01 23:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-02 8:58 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-10-03 21:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-04 16:23 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-10-08 22:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-08 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-09 7:53 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-10-16 0:50 ` Shaohua Li
2012-10-22 7:36 ` Shaohua Li
2012-10-23 5:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-10-23 5:51 ` Shaohua Li
2012-10-23 13:41 ` Rik van Riel
2012-10-24 1:13 ` Shaohua Li
2012-11-06 5:36 ` Shaohua Li
2012-11-14 9:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-11-19 2:33 ` Shaohua Li
2012-09-03 22:03 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120903220332.GA1997@barrios \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).