From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix compile warning of mmotm-2012-09-06-16-46
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:14:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120910011407.GA7500@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120907130605.be86f2a9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:06:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:57:10 +0900
> Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > When I compiled today, I met following warning.
> > Correct it.
> >
> > mm/memory.c: In function ___copy_page_range___:
> > include/linux/mmu_notifier.h:235:38: warning: ___mmun_end___ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> > mm/memory.c:1043:16: note: ___mmun_end___ was declared here
> > include/linux/mmu_notifier.h:235:38: warning: ___mmun_start___ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> > mm/memory.c:1042:16: note: ___mmun_start___ was declared here
> > LD mm/built-in.o
> >
> > Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
> > Cc: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > mm/memory.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > index 10e9b38..d000449 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > @@ -1039,8 +1039,8 @@ int copy_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
> > unsigned long next;
> > unsigned long addr = vma->vm_start;
> > unsigned long end = vma->vm_end;
> > - unsigned long mmun_start; /* For mmu_notifiers */
> > - unsigned long mmun_end; /* For mmu_notifiers */
> > + unsigned long uninitialized_var(mmun_start); /* For mmu_notifiers */
> > + unsigned long uninitialized_var(mmun_end); /* For mmu_notifiers */
> > int ret;
> >
>
> Well yes, but a) uninitialized_var is a bit ugly and has some potential
> to hide real bugs and b) it's not completely obvious that
> is_cow_mapping() is stable across those two calls.
>
> I think a better approach is this:
>
> --- a/mm/memory.c~mm-move-all-mmu-notifier-invocations-to-be-done-outside-the-pt-lock-fix-fix
> +++ a/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1041,6 +1041,7 @@ int copy_page_range(struct mm_struct *ds
> unsigned long end = vma->vm_end;
> unsigned long mmun_start; /* For mmu_notifiers */
> unsigned long mmun_end; /* For mmu_notifiers */
> + bool is_cow;
> int ret;
>
> /*
> @@ -1074,7 +1075,8 @@ int copy_page_range(struct mm_struct *ds
> * parent mm. And a permission downgrade will only happen if
> * is_cow_mapping() returns true.
> */
> - if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags)) {
> + is_cow = is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags);
> + if (is_cow) {
> mmun_start = addr;
> mmun_end = end;
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(src_mm, mmun_start,
> @@ -1095,7 +1097,7 @@ int copy_page_range(struct mm_struct *ds
> }
> } while (dst_pgd++, src_pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
>
> - if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags))
> + if (is_cow)
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(src_mm, mmun_start, mmun_end);
> return ret;
> }
>
> Unfortunately, my (old) versions of gcc are so stupid that they *still*
> generate the warning even when the code is as obviously correct as this :(
>
> Can you please test it with your compiler?
My compiler is stupidl, too. It still emit the samw warning when I apply
your patch. In addition, I can't see any benefit of text size.
barrios@bbox:~/linux-mmotm$ size mm/memory.o mm/memory.o.andrew
text data bss dec hex filename
29147 54 40 29241 7239 mm/memory.o
29147 54 40 29241 7239 mm/memory.o.andrew
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 0:57 [PATCH] mm: Fix compile warning of mmotm-2012-09-06-16-46 Minchan Kim
2012-09-07 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-09 6:57 ` Haggai Eran
2012-09-10 11:40 ` [PATCH] mm: Fix compiler warning in copy_page_range Haggai Eran
2012-09-11 6:21 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-10 1:14 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-09-10 1:15 ` [PATCH] mm: Fix compile warning of mmotm-2012-09-06-16-46 Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120910011407.GA7500@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=haggaie@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).