From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx175.postini.com [74.125.245.175]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 556C46B0069 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:06:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:06:17 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu Subject: Re: [glommer-memcg:kmemcg-slab 57/62] drivers/video/riva/fbdev.c:281:9: sparse: preprocessor token MAX_LEVEL redefined Message-ID: <20120910130617.GA11963@localhost> References: <20120910111638.GC9660@localhost> <20120910125759.GA11808@localhost> <504DE3DA.7000802@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <504DE3DA.7000802@parallels.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:58:02PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 09/10/2012 04:57 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Glauber, > > > > The patch entitled > > > > sl[au]b: Allocate objects from memcg cache > > > > changes > > > > include/linux/slub_def.h | 15 ++++++++++----- > > > > which triggers this warning: > > > > drivers/video/riva/fbdev.c:281:9: sparse: preprocessor token MAX_LEVEL redefined > > > > It's the MAX_LEVEL that is defined in include/linux/idr.h. > > > > MAX_LEVEL is obviously too generic. Better adding some prefix to it? > > > > I don't see any MAX_LEVEL definition in this patch. You say it is > defined in include/linux/idr.h, and as the diffstat shows, I am not > touching this file. It's a rather *unexpected* side effect. You changed slub_def.h to include memcontrol.h/cgroup.h which in turn includes idr.h. > I think this needs patching independently. Yes, sure. And perhaps send it for quick inclusion before your patches? Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org