From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx176.postini.com [74.125.245.176]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CA566B0070 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:20:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:19:49 +0100 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH] make GFP_NOTRACK flag unconditional Message-ID: <20120928131949.GE29125@suse.de> References: <1348826194-21781-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1348826194-21781-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:56:34PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > There was a general sentiment in a recent discussion (See > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/258) that the __GFP flags should be > defined unconditionally. Currently, the only offender is GFP_NOTRACK, > which is conditional to KMEMCHECK. > > This simple patch makes it unconditional. > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa > CC: Christoph Lameter > CC: Mel Gorman > CC: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Mel Gorman -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org