* [PATCH] mm: Avoid section mismatch warning for memblock_type_name.
@ 2012-09-28 11:16 raghu.prabhu13
2012-10-01 20:08 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: raghu.prabhu13 @ 2012-09-28 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm; +Cc: tj, benh, akpm, Raghavendra D Prabhu
From: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Following section mismatch warning is thrown during build;
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x32408f): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_type_name() to the variable .meminit.data:memblock
The function memblock_type_name() references
the variable __meminitdata memblock.
This is often because memblock_type_name lacks a __meminitdata
annotation or the annotation of memblock is wrong.
This is because memblock_type_name makes reference to memblock variable with
attribute __meminitdata. Hence, the warning (even if the function is inline).
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
---
mm/memblock.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 82aa349..8e7fb1f 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ static int memblock_memory_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
static int memblock_reserved_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
/* inline so we don't get a warning when pr_debug is compiled out */
-static inline const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
+static inline __init_memblock
+ const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
{
if (type == &memblock.memory)
return "memory";
--
1.7.12.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: Avoid section mismatch warning for memblock_type_name.
2012-09-28 11:16 [PATCH] mm: Avoid section mismatch warning for memblock_type_name raghu.prabhu13
@ 2012-10-01 20:08 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-10-01 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: raghu.prabhu13; +Cc: linux-mm, tj, benh, Raghavendra D Prabhu
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:46:44 +0530
raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
>
> Following section mismatch warning is thrown during build;
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x32408f): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_type_name() to the variable .meminit.data:memblock
> The function memblock_type_name() references
> the variable __meminitdata memblock.
> This is often because memblock_type_name lacks a __meminitdata
> annotation or the annotation of memblock is wrong.
>
> This is because memblock_type_name makes reference to memblock variable with
> attribute __meminitdata. Hence, the warning (even if the function is inline).
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 82aa349..8e7fb1f 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ static int memblock_memory_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
> static int memblock_reserved_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
>
> /* inline so we don't get a warning when pr_debug is compiled out */
> -static inline const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
> +static inline __init_memblock
> + const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
> {
> if (type == &memblock.memory)
> return "memory";
huh. If your compiler inlines that function, you won't get the
warning. Another reason why inline-considered-harmful nowadays. Let's
just nuke it.
Also, please note the code layout issue. There are two ways we'll
typically handle a definition like that:
static inline __init_memblock const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
or
static inline __init_memblock const char *
memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
You chose neither ;)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: mm-avoid-section-mismatch-warning-for-memblock_type_name-fix
remove inline
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/memblock.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/memblock.c~mm-avoid-section-mismatch-warning-for-memblock_type_name-fix mm/memblock.c
--- a/mm/memblock.c~mm-avoid-section-mismatch-warning-for-memblock_type_name-fix
+++ a/mm/memblock.c
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ static int memblock_memory_in_slab __ini
static int memblock_reserved_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
/* inline so we don't get a warning when pr_debug is compiled out */
-static inline __init_memblock
- const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
+static __init_memblock const char *
+memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
{
if (type == &memblock.memory)
return "memory";
_
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-01 20:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-28 11:16 [PATCH] mm: Avoid section mismatch warning for memblock_type_name raghu.prabhu13
2012-10-01 20:08 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).