linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] memcg: oom: fix totalpages calculation for swappiness==0
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:50:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121011085038.GA29295@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210101346010.31237@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Wed 10-10-12 13:50:21, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > I am sending the patch below as an RFC because I am not entirely happy
> > about myself and maybe somebody can come up with a different approach
> > which would be less hackish.
> 
> I don't see this as hackish, 

I didn't like how swappiness spreads outside of the LRU scanning code...

> if memory.swappiness limits access to swap then this shouldn't be
> factored into the calculation, and that's what your patch fixes.
> 
> The reason why the process with the largest rss isn't killed in this case 
> is because all processes have CAP_SYS_ADMIN so they get a 3% bonus;

OK I should have mentioned that I have tested it as root which makes a
big difference with the current upstream as totalpages are considered
only if adj!=0. 
I have originally seen the problem in 3.0 kernel (with fe35004f applied)
where the calculation is different (missing a7f638f9) and we always
consider total_pages there so it doesn't depend on root or oom_score_adj.

> when factoring swap into the calculation and subtracting 3% from
> the score in oom_badness(), they all end up having an internal
> score of 1 so they are all considered equal.  It appears like the
> cgroup_iter_next() iteration for memcg ooms does this in reverse
> order, which is actually helpful so it will select the task that is
> newer.
> 
> The only suggestion I have to make is specify this is for 
> memory.swappiness in the patch title, otherwise:

OK. I will also update the changelog to mention oom_score_adj and
CAP_SYS_ADMIN, mark the patch for stable and repost it.

> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

Thanks
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-11  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-10 14:11 [RFC PATCH] memcg: oom: fix totalpages calculation for swappiness==0 Michal Hocko
2012-10-10 20:50 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-11  8:50   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2012-10-11  8:57     ` [PATCH] memcg: oom: fix totalpages calculation for memory.swappiness==0 Michal Hocko
2012-10-11  9:13       ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-11 12:20       ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-12 13:01         ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-11 22:36       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-12 13:01         ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-15 22:04       ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Hocko
2012-10-15 22:07         ` [PATCH] doc: describe memcg swappiness more precisely memory.swappiness==0 Michal Hocko
2012-10-16  0:51           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-16  0:54           ` David Rientjes
2012-11-07 22:10         ` [PATCH v2] memcg: oom: fix totalpages calculation for memory.swappiness==0 Andrew Morton
2012-11-07 22:46           ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-07 22:53             ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-08  8:35               ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-15  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH] memcg: oom: fix totalpages calculation for swappiness==0 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-15  9:49   ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-15 14:25     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-15 14:47       ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-15 22:33         ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121011085038.GA29295@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).