From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx193.postini.com [74.125.245.193]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 820B76B002B for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 04:14:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from /spool/local by e8.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 04:14:58 -0400 Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA0F6E8060 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 04:14:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q9F8EsE9268168 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 04:14:54 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q9F8En7f002820 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 05:14:54 -0300 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:46:21 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] AutoNUMA27 Message-ID: <20121015081621.GC17364@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <1349308275-2174-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> <20121013184019.GA3837@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20121014045716.GE11663@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121014045716.GE11663@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pzijlstr@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, mel@csn.ul.ie, hughd@google.com, riel@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, dhillf@gmail.com, drjones@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, pjt@google.com, cl@linux.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, efault@gmx.de, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alex.shi@intel.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org > > Interesting. So numa01 should be improved in autonuma28fast. Not sure > why the hard binds show any difference, but I'm more concerned in > optimizing numa01. I get the same results from hard bindings on > upstream or autonuma, strange. > > Could you repeat only numa01 with the origin/autonuma28fast branch? Okay, will try to get the numbers on autonuma28 soon. > Also if you could post the two pdf convergence chart generated by > numa01 on autonuma27 and autonuma28fast, I think that would be > interesting to see the full effect and why it is faster. Have attached the chart for autonuma27 in a private email. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org