From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jiri.kosina@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: teach mm by current context info to not do I/O during memory allocation
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:49:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121016054946.GA3934@barrios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVM09H=8ZuFSzkcN1NmOCR1pcPUsuUyT9tpR0doVam2BiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:56:48AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 01:14:17PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> This patch introduces PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO on process flag('flags' field of
> >> 'struct task_struct'), so that the flag can be set by one task
> >> to avoid doing I/O inside memory allocation in the task's context.
> >>
> >> The patch trys to solve one deadlock problem caused by block device,
> >> and the problem can be occured at least in the below situations:
> >>
> >> - during block device runtime resume situation, if memory allocation
> >> with GFP_KERNEL is called inside runtime resume callback of any one
> >> of its ancestors(or the block device itself), the deadlock may be
> >> triggered inside the memory allocation since it might not complete
> >> until the block device becomes active and the involed page I/O finishes.
> >> The situation is pointed out first by Alan Stern. It is not a good
> >> approach to convert all GFP_KERNEL in the path into GFP_NOIO because
> >> several subsystems may be involved(for example, PCI, USB and SCSI may
> >> be involved for usb mass stoarage device)
> >
> > Couldn't we expand pm_restrict_gfp_mask to cover resume path as well as
> > suspend path?
>
> IMO, we could, but it is not good and might trigger memory allocation problem.
>
> pm_restrict_gfp_mask uses the global variable of gfp_allowed_mask to
> avoid allocating page with GFP_IOFS in all contexts during system sleep,
> when processes have been frozen.
>
> But during runtime PM, the whole system is running and all processes are
> runnable. Also runtime PM is per device and the whole system may have
> lots of devices, so taking the global gfp_allowed_mask may keep page
> allocation with ~GFP_IOFS for a considerable proportion of system
> running time, then alloc_page() will return failure easier.
>
> The above deadlock problem may be fixed by allocating memory with
> ~GFP_IOFS only in the context of calling runtime_resume, and that is
> idea of the patch.
Fair enough but it wouldn't be a good idea that add new unlikely branch
in allocator's fast path. Please move the check into slow path which could
be in __alloc_pages_slowpath.
>
> >
> >>
> >> - during error handling situation of usb mass storage deivce, USB
> >> bus reset will be put on the device, so there shouldn't have any
> >> memory allocation with GFP_KERNEL during USB bus reset, otherwise
> >> the deadlock similar with above may be triggered. Unfortunately, any
> >> usb device may include one mass storage interface in theory, so it
> >> requires all usb interface drivers to handle the situation. In fact,
> >> most usb drivers don't know how to handle bus reset on the device
> >> and don't provide .pre_set() and .post_reset() callback at all, so
> >> USB core has to unbind and bind driver for these devices. So it
> >> is still not practical to resort to GFP_NOIO for solving the problem.
> >
> > I hope this case could be handled by usb core like usb_restrict_gfp_mask
> > rather than adding new branch on fast path.
>
> See above, applying the global gfp_allowed_mask is not good.
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Ming Lei
--
Kind Regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-16 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1350278059-14904-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>
2012-10-15 5:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: teach mm by current context info to not do I/O during memory allocation Ming Lei
2012-10-15 14:33 ` Alan Stern
2012-10-15 14:41 ` Ming Lei
2012-10-15 15:47 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-16 1:56 ` Ming Lei
2012-10-16 5:49 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-10-16 7:08 ` Ming Lei
2012-10-16 13:09 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-16 13:47 ` Ming Lei
2012-10-16 13:53 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121016054946.GA3934@barrios \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiri.kosina@suse.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).