linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re:  Re: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/readahead: Check return value of read_pages
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:17:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121016174705.GC2826@Archie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120928115405.GA1525@localhost>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1549 bytes --]

Hi,


* On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 07:54:05PM +0800, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 06:55:03AM +0530, Raghavendra D Prabhu wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> * On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 08:43:37PM +0800, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> >On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 04:03:10PM +0530, raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>From: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net>
>> >>
>> >>Return value of a_ops->readpage will be propagated to return value of read_pages
>> >>and __do_page_cache_readahead.
>> >
>> >That does not explain the intention and benefit of this patch..
>>
>> I noticed that force_page_cache_readahead checks return value of
>> __do_page_cache_readahead but the actual error if any is never
>> propagated.
>
>force_page_cache_readahead()'s return value, in turn, is never used by
>its callers..
Yes, it is not called by its callers, however, since it is called 
in a loop, shouldn't we bail out if force_page_cache_readahead 
fails once? Without the appropriate return value, it will 
continue  and  in 

force_page_cache_readahead


		if (err < 0) {
			ret = err;
			break;
		}

	is never hit.
Nor does the other __do_page_cache_readahead() callers
>care about the error state. So until we find an actual user of the
>error code, I'd recommend to avoid changing the current code.
>
>Thanks,
>Fengguang
>




Regards,
-- 
Raghavendra Prabhu
GPG Id : 0xD72BE977
Fingerprint: B93F EBCB 8E05 7039 CD3C A4B8 A616 DCA1 D72B E977
www: wnohang.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-16 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-22 10:33 [PATCH 0/5] Readahead fixes / improvements raghu.prabhu13
     [not found] ` <cover.1348309711.git.rprabhu@wnohang.net>
2012-09-22 10:33   ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/readahead: Check return value of read_pages raghu.prabhu13
2012-09-22 12:43     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-26  1:25       ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2012-09-28 11:54         ` Fengguang Wu
2012-10-16 17:47           ` Raghavendra D Prabhu [this message]
2012-10-17  2:53             ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-22 10:33   ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/readahead: Change the condition for SetPageReadahead raghu.prabhu13
2012-09-22 12:49     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-26  1:29       ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2012-09-28 11:56         ` Fengguang Wu
2012-10-16 17:42           ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2012-10-17  2:34             ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-22 10:33   ` [PATCH 3/5] Remove file_ra_state from arguments of count_history_pages raghu.prabhu13
2012-09-22 12:40     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-10-16 18:21       ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2012-10-17  3:15         ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-22 10:33   ` [PATCH 4/5] Move the check for ra_pages after VM_SequentialReadHint() raghu.prabhu13
2012-09-22 12:42     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-26  1:39       ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2012-10-16 18:15       ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2012-10-17  3:13         ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-22 10:33   ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/readahead: Use find_get_pages instead of radix_tree_lookup raghu.prabhu13
2012-09-22 13:15     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-26  2:58       ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2012-09-28 12:18         ` Fengguang Wu
2012-10-16 16:59           ` Raghavendra D Prabhu
2012-10-17  2:12             ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121016174705.GC2826@Archie \
    --to=raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).