From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx142.postini.com [74.125.245.142]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE50B6B004D for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 18:32:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:32:13 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion Message-Id: <20121106153213.03e9cc9f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1351840367-4152-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> References: <1351840367-4152-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dan Magenheimer , Nitin Gupta , Seth Jennings , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Jens Axboe , Pekka Enberg , gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:12:44 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote: > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging. The changelogs are distressingly short of *reasons* for doing this! > Both are very clean and zram have been used by many embedded product > for a long time. Well that's interesting. Which embedded products? How are they using zram and what benefit are they observing from it, in what scenarios? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org