Re: [RFC 2/5] memcg: rework mem_cgroup_iter to use cgroup iterators

[Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:30:36PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> @@ -1063,8 +1063,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struct mem_cgroup *root,
>  				   struct mem_cgroup *prev,
>  				   struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie *reclaim)
>  {
> -	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
> -	int id = 0;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL,
> +			  *last_visited = NULL;

Nitpick but please don't do this.

> +		/*
> +		 * Root is not visited by cgroup iterators so it needs a special
> +		 * treatment.
> +		 */
> +		if (!last_visited) {
> +			css = &root->css;
> +		} else {
> +			struct cgroup *next_cgroup;
> +
> +			next_cgroup = cgroup_next_descendant_pre(
> +					last_visited->css.cgroup,
> +					root->css.cgroup);
> +			if (next_cgroup)
> +				css = cgroup_subsys_state(next_cgroup,
> +						mem_cgroup_subsys_id);

Hmmm... wouldn't it be better to move the reclaim logic into a
function and do the following?

	reclaim(root);
	for_each_descendent_pre()
		reclaim(descendant);

If this is a problem, I'd be happy to add a iterator which includes
the top node.  I'd prefer controllers not using the next functions
directly.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>