From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] rework mem_cgroup iterator
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:46:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121114184625.GE21185@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A45729.4000203@parallels.com>
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:44:57AM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why we can't do the other way around
> then, and use a for_each_*() for sched walks? Without even consider what
> I personally prefer, what I really don't like is to have two different
> cgroup walkers when it seems like we could very well have just one.
Ooh, sure thing, let's do that. Will work on that.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-13 15:30 [RFC] rework mem_cgroup iterator Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 1/5] memcg: synchronize per-zone iterator access by a spinlock Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 0:03 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 2/5] memcg: rework mem_cgroup_iter to use cgroup iterators Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-14 8:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 9:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15 14:47 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 15:12 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 16:15 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 0:20 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14 10:10 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15 4:12 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15 9:52 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-19 14:05 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-19 15:11 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 3/5] memcg: simplify mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 4/5] memcg: clean up mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 5/5] cgroup: remove css_get_next Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 0:13 ` [RFC] rework mem_cgroup iterator Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14 1:55 ` Li Zefan
2012-11-14 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 2:12 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14 16:17 ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-14 8:40 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 18:41 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 2:44 ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-14 18:46 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121114184625.GE21185@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).