From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx104.postini.com [74.125.245.104]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32B7D6B0044 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:52:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:52:22 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: dmapool: use provided gfp flags for all dma_alloc_coherent() calls Message-Id: <20121120115222.9b674d86.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <50AB600C.5010801@samsung.com> References: <1352356737-14413-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20121119001846.GB22106@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20121119144826.f59667b2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <50AB600C.5010801@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: Jason Cooper , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Andrew Lunn , Arnd Bergmann , Kyungmin Park , Soren Moch , Sebastian Hesselbarth On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:48:44 +0100 Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > As this patch is already in -next and is stuck there for two more > > weeks I can't (or at least won't) merge this patch, so I can't help > > with any of the above. > > I will fix both issues in the next version of the patch. Would like to > merge it to your tree or should I keep it in my dma-mapping tree? The patch looks OK to me now (still wondering about the -stable question though). It would be a bit of a pain for me to carry a patch which conflicts with one in linux-next, and this patch doesn't appear to conflict with the other pending dmapool.c patches in -mm so you may as well keep it in the dma-mapping tree now. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org