From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx160.postini.com [74.125.245.160]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E2B56B0070 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:03:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d41so5163338eek.14 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:03:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:03:06 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4 Message-ID: <20121121170306.GA28811@gmail.com> References: <1353493312-8069-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20121121165342.GH8218@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121121165342.GH8218@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Andrea Arcangeli , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins , Thomas Gleixner , Paul Turner , Lee Schermerhorn , Alex Shi , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , LKML * Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest > > schednuma figures I have available. > > > > Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202 > > I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with > > 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as Mel, I'd like to ask you to refer to our tree as numa/core or 'numacore' in the future. Would such a courtesy to use the current name of our tree be possible? (We dropped sched/numa long ago and that you still keep referring to it is rather confusing to me.) Thanks! Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org