From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx127.postini.com [74.125.245.127]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 999C76B0078 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:27:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:27:41 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Message-Id: <20121127112741.b616c2f6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1354010422-19648-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1354010422-19648-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Wen Congyang Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes , Jiang Liu , Len Brown , benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, Christoph Lameter , Minchan Kim , KOSAKI Motohiro , Yasuaki Ishimatsu , Jianguo Wu On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:00:10 +0800 Wen Congyang wrote: > The patch-set was divided from following thread's patch-set. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201 > > The last version of this patchset: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/1/93 As we're now at -rc7 I'd prefer to take a look at all of this after the 3.7 release - please resend everything shortly after 3.8-rc1. > If you want to know the reason, please read following thread. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/83 Please include the rationale within each version of the patchset rather than by linking to an old email. Because a) this way, more people are likely to read it b) it permits the text to be maimtained as the code evolves c) it permits the text to be included in the mainlnie commit, where people can find it. > The patch-set has only the function of kernel core side for physical > memory hot remove. So if you use the patch, please apply following > patches. > > - bug fix for memory hot remove > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/269 > > - acpi framework > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/26/175 What's happening with the acpi framework? has it received any feedback from the ACPI developers? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org