From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] HWPOISON, hugetlbfs: fix warning on freeing hwpoisoned hugepage
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:36:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121206143652.29c4922f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354744058-26373-2-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:47:36 -0500
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> This patch fixes the warning from __list_del_entry() which is triggered
> when a process tries to do free_huge_page() for a hwpoisoned hugepage.
>
> Originally, page->lru of hugetlbfs head page was dangling when the
> hugepage was in use. This behavior has changed by commit 0edaecfab218d7
> ("hugetlb: add a list for tracking in-use HugeTLB pages"), where hugepages
> in use are linked to hugepage_activelist. HWpoisoned hugepages should not
> be charged to any process, so we introduce another list to link hwpoisoned
> hugepages.
>
> ...
>
> --- v3.7-rc8.orig/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ v3.7-rc8/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -230,6 +230,9 @@ struct hstate {
> unsigned long nr_overcommit_huge_pages;
> struct list_head hugepage_activelist;
> struct list_head hugepage_freelists[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> + struct list_head hugepage_hwpoisonedlist;
> +#endif
> unsigned int nr_huge_pages_node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> unsigned int free_huge_pages_node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> unsigned int surplus_huge_pages_node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> diff --git v3.7-rc8.orig/mm/hugetlb.c v3.7-rc8/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 59a0059..e61a749 100644
> --- v3.7-rc8.orig/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ v3.7-rc8/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1939,6 +1939,7 @@ void __init hugetlb_add_hstate(unsigned order)
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; ++i)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->hugepage_freelists[i]);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->hugepage_activelist);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->hugepage_hwpoisonedlist);
> h->next_nid_to_alloc = first_node(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
> h->next_nid_to_free = first_node(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
> snprintf(h->name, HSTATE_NAME_LEN, "hugepages-%lukB",
> @@ -3170,7 +3171,7 @@ int dequeue_hwpoisoned_huge_page(struct page *hpage)
>
> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> if (is_hugepage_on_freelist(hpage)) {
> - list_del(&hpage->lru);
> + list_move(&hpage->lru, &h->hugepage_hwpoisonedlist);
> set_page_refcounted(hpage);
> h->free_huge_pages--;
> h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
Do we actually need to new list? We could use list_del_init() to leave
the page's list_head pointing at itself. In this state, it is its own
list_head and further list_del()s are a no-op.
I don't know whether this would trigger list-debug warnings.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-05 21:47 [PATCH 0/3] HWPOISON, hugetlbfs: small bug fixes Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-05 21:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] HWPOISON, hugetlbfs: fix warning on freeing hwpoisoned hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-05 22:13 ` Luck, Tony
2012-12-07 2:18 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-06 22:36 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-12-07 2:03 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-07 2:20 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-07 5:48 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-07 5:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-12-07 6:14 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-07 7:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-12-07 15:49 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-07 22:34 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-08 21:04 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-05 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] HWPOISON, hugetlbfs: fix "bad pmd" warning in unmapping " Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-05 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] HWPOISON, hugetlbfs: fix RSS-counter warning Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-05 22:04 ` Luck, Tony
2012-12-05 22:14 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-06 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-07 1:22 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2012-12-07 2:10 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-10 11:17 ` Simon Jeons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121206143652.29c4922f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).