From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx156.postini.com [74.125.245.156]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B2CB6B00D5 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 17:50:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:50:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] remove vm_struct list management Message-Id: <20121206145020.93fd7128.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1354810175-4338-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> References: <1354810175-4338-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Vivek Goyal On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 01:09:27 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > I'm not sure that "7/8: makes vmlist only for kexec" is fine. > Because it is related to userspace program. > As far as I know, makedumpfile use kexec's output information and it only > need first address of vmalloc layer. So my implementation reflect this > fact, but I'm not sure. And now, I don't fully test this patchset. > Basic operation work well, but I don't test kexec. So I send this > patchset with 'RFC'. Yes, this is irritating. Perhaps Vivek or one of the other kexec people could take a look at this please - if would obviously be much better if we can avoid merging [patch 7/8] at all. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org