From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@euromail.se>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Oops in 3.7-rc8 isolate_free_pages_block()
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 17:58:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121206165829.GA392@polaris.bitmath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121206161934.GA17258@suse.de>
Hi Mel,
> Still travelling and am not in a position to test this properly :(.
> However, this bug feels very similar to a bug in the migration scanner where
> a pfn_valid check is missed because the start is not aligned. Henrik, when
> did this start happening? I would be a little surprised if it started between
> 3.6 and 3.7-rcX but maybe it's just easier to hit now for some reason.
I started using transparent hugepages when moving to 3.7-rc1, so it is
quite possible that the problem was there already in 3.6.
> How reproducible is this? Is there anything in particular you do to
> trigger the oops?
Unfortunately nothing special, and it is rare. IIRC, it has happened
after a long uptime, but I guess that only means the probability of
the oops is higher then.
> Does the following patch help any? It's only compile tested I'm afraid.
>
> ---8<---
> mm: compaction: check pfn_valid when entering a new MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES block during isolation for free
>
> Commit 0bf380bc (mm: compaction: check pfn_valid when entering a new
> MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES block during isolation for migration) added a check
> for pfn_valid() when isolating pages for migration as the scanner does
> not necessarily start pageblock-aligned. However, the free scanner has
> the same problem. If it encounters a hole, it can also trigger an oops
> when is calls PageBuddy(page) on a page that is within an hole.
>
> Reported-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 9eef558..7d85ad485 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,16 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
> continue;
> if (!valid_page)
> valid_page = page;
> +
> + /*
> + * As blockpfn may not start aligned, blockpfn->end_pfn
> + * may cross a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary and a pfn_valid
> + * check is necessary. If the pfn is not valid, stop
> + * isolation.
> + */
> + if ((blockpfn & (MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES - 1)) == 0 &&
> + !pfn_valid(blockpfn))
> + break;
> if (!PageBuddy(page))
> continue;
>
I am running with it now, adding a printout to see if the case happens
at all. Might take a while, will try to stress the machine a bit.
Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20121206091744.GA1397@polaris.bitmath.org>
2012-12-06 14:48 ` Oops in 3.7-rc8 isolate_free_pages_block() Jan Kara
2012-12-06 15:22 ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-12-06 16:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-06 16:35 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-06 16:19 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-06 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-06 17:55 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-06 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-06 18:21 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-06 18:32 ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-12-06 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-06 19:01 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-06 19:28 ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-12-06 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-06 21:39 ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-12-07 8:32 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-06 16:58 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
2012-12-06 17:22 ` Henrik Rydberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121206165829.GA392@polaris.bitmath.org \
--to=rydberg@euromail.se \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).