linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT TREE] Unified NUMA balancing tree, v3
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:03:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121210210330.GA16207@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121210200755.GA15097@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> > If you had read that report, you would know that I didn't 
> > have results for specjbb with THP enabled due to the JVM 
> > crashing with null pointer exceptions.
> 
> Hm, it's the unified tree where most of the mm/ bits are the 
> AutoNUMA bits from your tree. (It does not match 100%, because 
> your tree has an ancient version of key memory usage 
> statistics that the scheduler needs for its convergence model. 
> I'll take a look at the differences.)

Beyond the difference in page frame statistics and the 
difference in the handling of "4K-EMU", the bits below are the 
difference I found (on the THP side) between numa/base-v3 and 
your -v10 tree - but I'm not sure it should have effect on your 
JVM segfault under THP ...

I tried with preemption on/off, debugging on/off, tried your 
.config - none triggers JVM segfaults with 4x JVM or 1x JVM 
SPECjbb tests.

Thanks,

	Ingo

------------------------->
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index c25e37c..409b2f3 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -711,8 +711,7 @@ out:
 	 * run pte_offset_map on the pmd, if an huge pmd could
 	 * materialize from under us from a different thread.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(pmd_none(*pmd)) &&
-	    unlikely(__pte_alloc(mm, vma, pmd, address)))
+	if (unlikely(__pte_alloc(mm, vma, pmd, address)))
 		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
 	/* if an huge pmd materialized from under us just retry later */
 	if (unlikely(pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)))
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 8022526..30e1335 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3845,8 +3750,7 @@ retry:
 	 * run pte_offset_map on the pmd, if an huge pmd could
 	 * materialize from under us from a different thread.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(pmd_none(*pmd)) &&
-	    unlikely(__pte_alloc(mm, vma, pmd, address)))
+	if (unlikely(pmd_none(*pmd)) && __pte_alloc(mm, vma, pmd, address))
 		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
 	/* if an huge pmd materialized from under us just retry later */
 	if (unlikely(pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)))

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-10 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07  0:19 [GIT TREE] Unified NUMA balancing tree, v3 Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07  0:19 ` [PATCH 1/9] numa, sched: Fix NUMA tick ->numa_shared setting Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07  0:19 ` [PATCH 2/9] numa, sched: Add tracking of runnable NUMA tasks Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07  0:19 ` [PATCH 3/9] numa, sched: Implement wake-cpu migration support Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07  0:19 ` [PATCH 4/9] numa, mm, sched: Implement last-CPU+PID hash tracking Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07  0:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] numa, mm, sched: Fix NUMA affinity tracking logic Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07  0:19 ` [PATCH 6/9] numa, mm: Fix !THP, 4K-pte "2M-emu" NUMA fault handling Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07  0:19 ` [PATCH 7/9] numa, sched: Improve staggered convergence Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07  0:19 ` [PATCH 8/9] numa, sched: Improve directed convergence Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07  0:19 ` [PATCH 9/9] numa, sched: Streamline and fix numa_allow_migration() use Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 18:22 ` [GIT TREE] Unified NUMA balancing tree, v3 Thomas Gleixner
2012-12-10 18:41   ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-10 19:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 19:28       ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-10 20:07         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 20:10           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 21:03           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-12-10 22:19           ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-10 19:32   ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121210210330.GA16207@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).