linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/8] mm: memcg: only evict file pages when we have plenty
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:44:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121213144438.GC9887@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121213100704.GV1009@suse.de>

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:07:04AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:28:44PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:53:36PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > On 12/12/2012 04:43 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > >dc0422c "mm: vmscan: only evict file pages when we have plenty" makes
> 
> You are using some internal tree for that commit. Now that it's upstream
> it is commit e9868505987a03a26a3979f27b82911ccc003752.
> 
> > > >a point of not going for anonymous memory while there is still enough
> > > >inactive cache around.
> > > >
> > > >The check was added only for global reclaim, but it is just as useful
> > > >for memory cgroup reclaim.
> > > >
> > > >Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > > >---
> > > >  mm/vmscan.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> > > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > <SNIP>
> > > 
> > > I believe the if() block should be moved to AFTER
> > > the check where we make sure we actually have enough
> > > file pages.
> > 
> > You are absolutely right, this makes more sense.  Although I'd figure
> > the impact would be small because if there actually is that little
> > file cache, it won't be there for long with force-file scanning... :-)
> > 
> 
> Does it actually make sense? Lets take the global reclaim case.
> 
> <stupidity snipped>

I made a stupid mistake that Michal Hocko pointed out to me. The goto
out means that it should be fine either way.

> I'm not being super thorough because I'm not quite sure this is the right
> patch if the motivation is for memcg to use the same logic. Instead of
> moving this if, why do you not estimate "free" for the memcg based on the
> hard limit and current usage? 
> 

I'm still curious about this part.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-13 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 21:43 [patch 0/8] page reclaim bits Johannes Weiner
2012-12-12 21:43 ` [patch 1/8] mm: memcg: only evict file pages when we have plenty Johannes Weiner
2012-12-12 21:53   ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-12 22:28     ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-13 10:07       ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-13 14:44         ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-12-13 14:55       ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-16  1:21         ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-17 15:54           ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-19  5:21             ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-19  9:20               ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-13  5:36     ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-13  5:34   ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-12 21:43 ` [patch 2/8] mm: vmscan: disregard swappiness shortly before going OOM Johannes Weiner
2012-12-12 22:01   ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-13  5:56   ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-13 10:34   ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-13 15:29     ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-13 16:05       ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-13 22:25         ` Satoru Moriya
2012-12-14  4:50           ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-14  8:37             ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-14 15:43               ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-14 16:13                 ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-15  0:18                   ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-17 16:37                     ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-17 17:54                       ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-17 19:58                         ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-14 20:17                 ` Satoru Moriya
2012-12-14 19:44               ` Satoru Moriya
2012-12-13 19:05     ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-13 19:47       ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-12 21:43 ` [patch 3/8] mm: vmscan: save work scanning (almost) empty LRU lists Johannes Weiner
2012-12-12 22:02   ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-13 10:41   ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-13 19:33     ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-13 15:43   ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-13 19:38     ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-14  8:46       ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-12 21:43 ` [patch 4/8] mm: vmscan: clarify LRU balancing close to OOM Johannes Weiner
2012-12-12 22:03   ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-13 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-12 21:43 ` [patch 5/8] mm: vmscan: improve comment on low-page cache handling Johannes Weiner
2012-12-12 22:04   ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-13 10:47   ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-13 16:07   ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-12 21:43 ` [patch 6/8] mm: vmscan: clean up get_scan_count() Johannes Weiner
2012-12-12 22:06   ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-13 11:07   ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-13 16:18   ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-12 21:43 ` [patch 7/8] mm: vmscan: compaction works against zones, not lruvecs Johannes Weiner
2012-12-12 22:31   ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-13 11:12   ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-13 16:48   ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-12 21:43 ` [patch 8/8] mm: reduce rmap overhead for ex-KSM page copies created on swap faults Johannes Weiner
2012-12-12 22:34   ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-12 21:50 ` [patch 0/8] page reclaim bits Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121213144438.GC9887@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).