From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
riel@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com,
agl@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] virtio_balloon: move locking to the balloon thread
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:47:48 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121219104748.336fc33f@doriath.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121219115557.GA1809@t510.redhat.com>
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:55:58 -0200
Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:17:29PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Today, the balloon_lock mutex is taken and released by fill_balloon()
> > and leak_balloon() when both functions are entered and when they
> > return.
> >
> > This commit moves the locking to the caller instead, which is
> > the balloon() thread. The balloon thread is the sole caller of those
> > functions today.
> >
> > The reason for this move is that the next commit will introduce
> > a shrinker callback for the balloon driver, which will also call
> > leak_balloon() but will require different locking semantics.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 6 ++----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > index 2a70558..877e695 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> > @@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ static void fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> > /* We can only do one array worth at a time. */
> > num = min(num, ARRAY_SIZE(vb->pfns));
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > for (vb->num_pfns = 0; vb->num_pfns < num;
> > vb->num_pfns += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE) {
> > struct page *page = balloon_page_enqueue(vb_dev_info);
> > @@ -155,7 +154,6 @@ static void fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> > /* Did we get any? */
> > if (vb->num_pfns != 0)
> > tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq);
> > - mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > }
> >
>
> Since you're removing the locking scheme from within this function, I think it
> would be a good idea introduce a comment stating its caller must held the mutex
> vb->balloon_lock.
Will address all comments for v1 (or rfc v2), thanks Rafael.
>
>
> > static void release_pages_by_pfn(const u32 pfns[], unsigned int num)
> > @@ -177,7 +175,6 @@ static void leak_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> > /* We can only do one array worth at a time. */
> > num = min(num, ARRAY_SIZE(vb->pfns));
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > for (vb->num_pfns = 0; vb->num_pfns < num;
> > vb->num_pfns += VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE) {
> > page = balloon_page_dequeue(vb_dev_info);
> > @@ -193,7 +190,6 @@ static void leak_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num)
> > * is true, we *have* to do it in this order
> > */
> > tell_host(vb, vb->deflate_vq);
> > - mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > release_pages_by_pfn(vb->pfns, vb->num_pfns);
> > }
> >
>
> ditto
>
>
> > @@ -306,11 +302,13 @@ static int balloon(void *_vballoon)
> > || freezing(current));
> > if (vb->need_stats_update)
> > stats_handle_request(vb);
> > + mutex_lock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > if (diff > 0)
> > fill_balloon(vb, diff);
> > else if (diff < 0)
> > leak_balloon(vb, -diff);
> > update_balloon_size(vb);
> > + mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock);
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Just a nitpick:
> As leak_balloon() is also called at remove_common(), you'll need to introduce the
> mutex there, similarly.
>
>
> Thanks for move this forward.
>
> Cheers!
> -- Rafael
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-19 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-18 20:17 [RFC 0/2] auto-ballooning prototype (guest part) Luiz Capitulino
2012-12-18 20:17 ` [RFC 1/2] virtio_balloon: move locking to the balloon thread Luiz Capitulino
2012-12-19 11:55 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-12-19 12:47 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2012-12-18 20:17 ` [RFC 2/2] virtio_balloon: add auto-ballooning support Luiz Capitulino
2013-01-11 20:43 ` Amit Shah
2013-01-14 12:05 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-01-25 10:14 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121219104748.336fc33f@doriath.home \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).