From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix null pointer dereference in wait_iff_congested()
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:50:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121231005013.GA3641@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50DD9EA7.6050309@iskon.hr>
Hi Zlatko,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 02:29:11PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> On 28.12.2012 03:49, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >Hello Zlatko,
> >
> >On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:16:38AM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> >>From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
> >>
> >>The unintended consequence of commit 4ae0a48b is that
> >>wait_iff_congested() can now be called with NULL struct zone*
> >>producing kernel oops like this:
> >
> >For good description, it would be better to write simple pseudo code
> >flow to show how NULL-zone pass into wait_iff_congested because
> >kswapd code flow is too complex.
> >
> >As I see the code, we have following line above wait_iff_congested.
> >
> >if (!unbalanced_zone || blah blah)
> > break;
> >
> >How can NULL unbalanced_zone reach wait_iff_congested?
> >
>
> Hello Minchan, and thanks for the comment.
>
> That line was there before commit 4ae0a48b got in, and you're right,
Argh, I didn't see 4ae0a48b in 3.8-rc1.
> it's what was protecting wait_iff_congested() from being called with
> NULL zone*. But then all that logic got colapsed to a simple
> pgdat_balanced() call and that's when I introduced the bug, I lost
> the protection.
>
> What I _think_ is happening (pseudo code following...) is that after
> scanning the zone in the dma->highmem direction, and concluding that
> all zones are balanced (unbalanced_zone remains NULL!),
> wake_up(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait) wakes up a lot of memory hungry
> processes (especially true in various aggressive test/benchmarks)
> that immediately drain and unbalance one or more zones. Then
> pgdat_balanced() call which immediately follows will be false, but
> we still have unbalanced_zone = NULL, rememeber? Oops...
>
> But, all that is a speculation that I can't prove atm. Of course, if
> anybody thinks that's a credible explanation, I could add it as a
> commit comment, or even as a code comment, but I didn't want to be
> overly imaginative. The fix itself is simple and real.
Never mind. My confusing is caused my missing 4ae0a48b in lasest tree.
Thanks, Zlatko.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Zlatko
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-31 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-19 23:17 [PATCH] mm: do not sleep in balance_pgdat if there's no i/o congestion Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-19 23:25 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-21 11:51 ` Hillf Danton
2012-12-27 15:42 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-29 7:25 ` Hillf Danton
2012-12-29 12:11 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-20 11:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-20 20:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-22 18:54 ` [PATCH] mm: modify pgdat_balanced() so that it also handles order=0 Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-23 14:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-26 15:07 ` [PATCH] mm: avoid calling pgdat_balanced() needlessly Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-28 2:16 ` [PATCH] mm: fix null pointer dereference in wait_iff_congested() Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-28 2:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-12-28 13:29 ` Zlatko Calusic
2012-12-31 0:50 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-12-29 8:45 ` Sedat Dilek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121231005013.GA3641@blaptop \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr \
--cc=zliu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).