Re: [patch 2/3 v2]swap: make each swap partition have one address_space

[Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:36:55PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:16:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Looks good to me. Below just nitpicks.
> > I saw Andrew already took this into mmotm so I'm not sure he or you will do
> > next spin but anyway, review goes. Just nitpicks and a question.
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:29:51AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > 
> > > When I use several fast SSD to do swap, swapper_space.tree_lock is heavily
> > > contended. This makes each swap partition have one address_space to reduce the
> > > lock contention. There is an array of address_space for swap. The swap entry
> > > type is the index to the array.
> > > 
> > > In my test with 3 SSD, this increases the swapout throughput 20%.
> > > 
> > > V1->V2: simplify code
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  fs/proc/meminfo.c    |    4 +--
> > >  include/linux/swap.h |    9 ++++----
> > >  mm/memcontrol.c      |    4 +--
> > >  mm/mincore.c         |    5 ++--
> > >  mm/swap.c            |    9 ++++++--
> > >  mm/swap_state.c      |   57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > >  mm/swapfile.c        |    5 ++--
> > >  mm/util.c            |   10 ++++++--
> > >  8 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Index: linux/include/linux/swap.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/include/linux/swap.h	2013-01-22 09:13:14.000000000 +0800
> > > +++ linux/include/linux/swap.h	2013-01-22 09:34:44.923011706 +0800
> > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> > >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> > >  #include <linux/node.h>
> > > -
> > > +#include <linux/fs.h>
> > >  #include <linux/atomic.h>
> > >  #include <asm/page.h>
> > >  
> > > @@ -330,8 +330,9 @@ int generic_swapfile_activate(struct swa
> > >  		sector_t *);
> > >  
> > >  /* linux/mm/swap_state.c */
> > > -extern struct address_space swapper_space;
> > > -#define total_swapcache_pages  swapper_space.nrpages
> > > +extern struct address_space swapper_spaces[];
> > > +#define swap_address_space(entry) (&swapper_spaces[swp_type(entry)])
> > 
> > How about this naming?
> > 
> > #define swapper_space(entry) (&swapper_spaces[swp_type(entry)])
> > 
> > > +extern unsigned long total_swapcache_pages(void);
> > >  extern void show_swap_cache_info(void);
> > >  extern int add_to_swap(struct page *);
> > >  extern int add_to_swap_cache(struct page *, swp_entry_t, gfp_t);
> > > @@ -382,7 +383,7 @@ mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache(struct pag
> > >  
> > >  #define nr_swap_pages				0L
> > >  #define total_swap_pages			0L
> > > -#define total_swapcache_pages			0UL
> > > +#define total_swapcache_pages()			0UL
> > >  
> > >  #define si_swapinfo(val) \
> > >  	do { (val)->freeswap = (val)->totalswap = 0; } while (0)
> > > Index: linux/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/mm/memcontrol.c	2013-01-22 09:13:14.000000000 +0800
> > Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > 
> > > +++ linux/mm/memcontrol.c	2013-01-22 09:29:29.374977700 +0800
> > > @@ -6279,7 +6279,7 @@ static struct page *mc_handle_swap_pte(s
> > >  	 * Because lookup_swap_cache() updates some statistics counter,
> > >  	 * we call find_get_page() with swapper_space directly.
> > >  	 */
> > > -	page = find_get_page(&swapper_space, ent.val);
> > > +	page = find_get_page(swap_address_space(ent), ent.val);
> > >  	if (do_swap_account)
> > >  		entry->val = ent.val;
> > >  
> > > @@ -6320,7 +6320,7 @@ static struct page *mc_handle_file_pte(s
> > >  		swp_entry_t swap = radix_to_swp_entry(page);
> > >  		if (do_swap_account)
> > >  			*entry = swap;
> > > -		page = find_get_page(&swapper_space, swap.val);
> > > +		page = find_get_page(swap_address_space(swap), swap.val);
> > >  	}
> > >  #endif
> > >  	return page;
> > > Index: linux/mm/mincore.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/mm/mincore.c	2013-01-22 09:13:14.000000000 +0800
> > > +++ linux/mm/mincore.c	2013-01-22 09:29:29.378977649 +0800
> > > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static unsigned char mincore_page(struct
> > >  	/* shmem/tmpfs may return swap: account for swapcache page too. */
> > >  	if (radix_tree_exceptional_entry(page)) {
> > >  		swp_entry_t swap = radix_to_swp_entry(page);
> > > -		page = find_get_page(&swapper_space, swap.val);
> > > +		page = find_get_page(swap_address_space(swap), swap.val);
> > >  	}
> > >  #endif
> > >  	if (page) {
> > > @@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ static void mincore_pte_range(struct vm_
> > >  			} else {
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> > >  				pgoff = entry.val;
> > > -				*vec = mincore_page(&swapper_space, pgoff);
> > > +				*vec = mincore_page(swap_address_space(entry),
> > > +					pgoff);
> > >  #else
> > >  				WARN_ON(1);
> > >  				*vec = 1;
> > > Index: linux/mm/swap.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/mm/swap.c	2013-01-22 09:13:14.000000000 +0800
> > > +++ linux/mm/swap.c	2013-01-22 09:29:29.378977649 +0800
> > > @@ -855,9 +855,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pagevec_lookup_tag);
> > >  void __init swap_setup(void)
> > >  {
> > >  	unsigned long megs = totalram_pages >> (20 - PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > -
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> > > -	bdi_init(swapper_space.backing_dev_info);
> > > +	int i;
> > > +
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_SWAPFILES; i++) {
> > > +		bdi_init(swapper_spaces[i].backing_dev_info);
> > > +		spin_lock_init(&swapper_spaces[i].tree_lock);
> > > +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&swapper_spaces[i].i_mmap_nonlinear);
> > > +	}
> > >  #endif
> > >  
> > >  	/* Use a smaller cluster for small-memory machines */
> > > Index: linux/mm/swap_state.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/mm/swap_state.c	2013-01-22 09:13:14.000000000 +0800
> > > +++ linux/mm/swap_state.c	2013-01-22 09:29:29.378977649 +0800
> > > @@ -36,12 +36,12 @@ static struct backing_dev_info swap_back
> > >  	.capabilities	= BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_AND_WRITEBACK | BDI_CAP_SWAP_BACKED,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > -struct address_space swapper_space = {
> > > -	.page_tree	= RADIX_TREE_INIT(GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOWARN),
> > > -	.tree_lock	= __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(swapper_space.tree_lock),
> > > -	.a_ops		= &swap_aops,
> > > -	.i_mmap_nonlinear = LIST_HEAD_INIT(swapper_space.i_mmap_nonlinear),
> > > -	.backing_dev_info = &swap_backing_dev_info,
> > > +struct address_space swapper_spaces[MAX_SWAPFILES] = {
> > > +	[0 ... MAX_SWAPFILES - 1] = {
> > > +		.page_tree	= RADIX_TREE_INIT(GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOWARN),
> > > +		.a_ops		= &swap_aops,
> > > +		.backing_dev_info = &swap_backing_dev_info,
> > > +	}
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  #define INC_CACHE_INFO(x)	do { swap_cache_info.x++; } while (0)
> > > @@ -53,9 +53,19 @@ static struct {
> > >  	unsigned long find_total;
> > >  } swap_cache_info;
> > >  
> > > +unsigned long total_swapcache_pages(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	int i;
> > > +	unsigned long ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_SWAPFILES; i++)
> > > +		ret += swapper_spaces[i].nrpages;
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  void show_swap_cache_info(void)
> > >  {
> > > -	printk("%lu pages in swap cache\n", total_swapcache_pages);
> > > +	printk("%lu pages in swap cache\n", total_swapcache_pages());
> > >  	printk("Swap cache stats: add %lu, delete %lu, find %lu/%lu\n",
> > >  		swap_cache_info.add_total, swap_cache_info.del_total,
> > >  		swap_cache_info.find_success, swap_cache_info.find_total);
> > > @@ -70,23 +80,26 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
> > >  static int __add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry)
> > >  {
> > >  	int error;
> > > +	struct address_space *address_space;
> > >  
> > >  	VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
> > >  	VM_BUG_ON(PageSwapCache(page));
> > >  	VM_BUG_ON(!PageSwapBacked(page));
> > >  
> > >  	page_cache_get(page);
> > > -	SetPageSwapCache(page);
> > >  	set_page_private(page, entry.val);
> > > +	SetPageSwapCache(page);
> > 
> > Why did you move this line? Is there any special reason?
> 
> Originally I'm afraid page_mapping() gets invalid page_private(), but I then
> realized we hold page lock. There are some places we don't hold page lock.
> either such page isn't swap page or the caller can tolerate race. I forgot
> removing this change in the patch. But I certainly can be wrong. We can add
> memory barrier if required.

Yeb. While I reviewed the patch, I was concern about that but I fail to find
a problem, too. But maybe it's valuable to add comment about that race
(!PageSwapCache(page) but page_mapping could return swapper_space) in page_mapping.
So if some problem happens in the future, people could help to find culprit.

Could you respin this with adding the comment and removing above unnecessary moving?

> 
> Thanks,
> Shaohua
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>