From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx114.postini.com [74.125.245.114]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2B446B0005 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:37:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id bg2so383131pad.18 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:37:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:37:01 -0800 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific locking Message-ID: <20130125173701.GH3081@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1358862461-18046-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <510258D0.6060407@parallels.com> <20130125101854.GC8876@dhcp22.suse.cz> <51025E2B.4080105@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51025E2B.4080105@parallels.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand Cc: Michal Hocko , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Johannes Weiner , kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton Hey, On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:27:55PM +0400, Lord Glauber Costa of Sealand wrote: > > I would vote to -mm. Or is there any specific reason to have it in > > cgroup tree? It doesn't touch any cgroup core parts, does it? > > > Copying Andrew (retroactively sorry you weren't directly CCd on this one > as well). > > I depend on css_online and the cgroup generic iterator. If they are > already present @ -mm, then fine. > (looking now, they seem to be...) Yeah, they're all in cgroup/for-next so should be available in -mm, so I think -mm probably is the better tree to route these. Thanks! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org