From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx143.postini.com [74.125.245.143]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9860C6B0007 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:34:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:34:08 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/7] zsmalloc: promote to lib/ Message-Id: <20130130153408.fa099efb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <51094A39.8050206@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1359495627-30285-1-git-send-email-sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1359495627-30285-3-git-send-email-sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130129145134.813672cf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <51094A39.8050206@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Seth Jennings Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nitin Gupta , Minchan Kim , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Dan Magenheimer , Robert Jennings , Jenifer Hopper , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Rik van Riel , Larry Woodman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:28:41 -0600 Seth Jennings wrote: > Question, are you saying that you'd like to see the zsmalloc promotion > in a separate patch? > > My reason for including the zsmalloc promotion inside the zswap > patches was that it promoted and introduced a user all together. > However, I don't have an issue with breaking it out. Keeping it all in the one series is logical. I want to see the code get the normal explain/review/comment process. Michan has been doing sterling work here but I don't think the rest of us understand the code as well as we can and should. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org