linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>, Bryan Freed <bfreed@google.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: prevent to add a page to swap if may_writepage is unset
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:43:08 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130205014308.GG2610@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130122000954.GH3666@blaptop>

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:09:54AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:39:06AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On 01/20/2013 08:52 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > 
> > > From 94086dc7152359d052802c55c82ef19509fe8cce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > >From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > >Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:43:43 +0900
> > >Subject: [PATCH] mm: Use up free swap space before reaching OOM kill
> > >
> > >Recently, Luigi reported there are lots of free swap space when
> > >OOM happens. It's easily reproduced on zram-over-swap, where
> > >many instance of memory hogs are running and laptop_mode is enabled.
> > >He said there was no problem when he disabled laptop_mode.
> > >The problem when I investigate problem is following as.
> > >
> > >Assumption for easy explanation: There are no page cache page in system
> > >because they all are already reclaimed.
> > >
> > >1. try_to_free_pages disable may_writepage when laptop_mode is enabled.
> > >2. shrink_inactive_list isolates victim pages from inactive anon lru list.
> > >3. shrink_page_list adds them to swapcache via add_to_swap but it doesn't
> > >    pageout because sc->may_writepage is 0 so the page is rotated back into
> > >    inactive anon lru list. The add_to_swap made the page Dirty by SetPageDirty.
> > >4. 3 couldn't reclaim any pages so do_try_to_free_pages increase priority and
> > >    retry reclaim with higher priority.
> > >5. shrink_inactlive_list try to isolate victim pages from inactive anon lru list
> > >    but got failed because it try to isolate pages with ISOLATE_CLEAN mode but
> > >    inactive anon lru list is full of dirty pages by 3 so it just returns
> > >    without  any reclaim progress.
> > >6. do_try_to_free_pages doesn't set may_writepage due to zero total_scanned.
> > >    Because sc->nr_scanned is increased by shrink_page_list but we don't call
> > >    shrink_page_list in 5 due to short of isolated pages.
> > >
> > >Above loop is continued until OOM happens.
> > >The problem didn't happen before [1] was merged because old logic's
> > >isolatation in shrink_inactive_list was successful and tried to call
> > >shrink_page_list to pageout them but it still ends up failed to page out
> > >by may_writepage. But important point is that sc->nr_scanned was increased
> > >although we couldn't swap out them so do_try_to_free_pages could set
> > >may_writepages.
> > >
> > >Since [1] was introduced, it's not a good idea any more to depends on
> > >only the number of scanned pages for setting may_writepage. So this patch
> > >adds new trigger point of setting may_writepage as below DEF_PRIOIRTY - 2
> > >which is used to show the significant memory pressure in VM so it's good
> > >fit for our purpose which would be better to lose power saving or clickety
> > >rather than OOM killing.
> > >
> > >[1] f80c067[mm: zone_reclaim: make isolate_lru_page() filter-aware]
> > >
> > >Reported-by: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
> > >Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Your patch is a nice simplification.  I am ok with the
> > change, provided it works for Luigi :)
> 
> Thanks, Rik.
> 
> Oops, I missed to Ccing Luigi. Add him again.
> Luigi, Could you test this patch?
> Thanks for your endless effort.
> 
> > 
> > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > 


Andrew,
I hope Luigi confirms this patch but he seems to be very busy.
At a minimum, I tested this patch and passed my test.
Could you apply this and remove [2]?
Otherwise, should I wait for Luigi?

[2] mm: prevent addition of pages to swap if may_writepage is unset

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-05  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-09  6:21 [PATCH 0/2] Use up free swap space before reaching OOM kill Minchan Kim
2013-01-09  6:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: prevent to add a page to swap if may_writepage is unset Minchan Kim
2013-01-09  6:56   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-01-09  7:10     ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-10  0:18   ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-10  2:03     ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-10 23:24       ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-01-10 23:27         ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-01-11  4:03         ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-10  0:20   ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-16 21:41   ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-17  0:53     ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-17 22:22       ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-17 23:36         ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-21  1:52           ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-21 14:39             ` Rik van Riel
2013-01-22  0:09               ` Minchan Kim
2013-02-05  1:43                 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2013-01-09  6:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: forcely swapout when we are out of page cache Minchan Kim
2013-01-10  0:26   ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-10  2:23     ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-10 21:58       ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-11  4:43         ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-16  0:09           ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-16  0:32             ` Sonny Rao
2013-01-16  0:50               ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-16  1:21                 ` Sonny Rao
2013-01-16  4:47                   ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-16 20:08                     ` Sonny Rao
2013-01-16  4:43             ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130205014308.GG2610@blaptop \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bfreed@google.com \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=semenzato@google.com \
    --cc=sonnyrao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).