linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@bitsync.net>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	dormando <dormando@rydia.net>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat based on reclaim progress
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:32:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321153231.GP6094@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363525456-10448-5-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>

On Sun 17-03-13 13:04:10, Mel Gorman wrote:
> In the past, kswapd makes a decision on whether to compact memory after the
> pgdat was considered balanced. This more or less worked but it is late to
> make such a decision and does not fit well now that kswapd makes a decision
> whether to exit the zone scanning loop depending on reclaim progress.
> 
> This patch will compact a pgdat if at least  the requested number of pages
> were reclaimed from unbalanced zones for a given priority. If any zone is
> currently balanced, kswapd will not call compaction as it is expected the
> necessary pages are already available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 279d0c2..7513bd1 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2694,8 +2694,11 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  
>  	do {
>  		unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
> +		unsigned long nr_to_reclaim = 0;
>  		unsigned long nr_reclaimed = sc.nr_reclaimed;
> +		unsigned long this_reclaimed;
>  		bool raise_priority = true;
> +		bool pgdat_needs_compaction = true;

I am confused. We don't want to compact for order == 0, do we?

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 7513bd1..1b89c29 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2698,7 +2698,7 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
 		unsigned long nr_reclaimed = sc.nr_reclaimed;
 		unsigned long this_reclaimed;
 		bool raise_priority = true;
-		bool pgdat_needs_compaction = true;
+		bool pgdat_needs_compaction = order > 0;
 
 		/*
 		 * Scan in the highmem->dma direction for the highest

Other than that it makes sense to me.

>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Scan in the highmem->dma direction for the highest
> @@ -2743,7 +2746,17 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
>  			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
>  
> +			if (!populated_zone(zone))
> +				continue;
> +
>  			lru_pages += zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
> +
> +			/* Check if the memory needs to be defragmented */
> +			if (order && pgdat_needs_compaction &&
> +					zone_watermark_ok(zone, order,
> +						low_wmark_pages(zone),
> +						*classzone_idx, 0))
> +				pgdat_needs_compaction = false;
>  		}
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -2814,6 +2827,8 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  				 */
>  				if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, &sc, lru_pages))
>  					raise_priority = false;
> +
> +				nr_to_reclaim += sc.nr_to_reclaim;
>  			}
>  
>  			/*
> @@ -2864,46 +2879,21 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  		if (try_to_freeze() || kthread_should_stop())
>  			break;
>  
> -		/* If no reclaim progress then increase scanning priority */
> -		if (sc.nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed == 0)
> -			raise_priority = true;
> +		/* Compact if necessary and kswapd is reclaiming efficiently */
> +		this_reclaimed = sc.nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed;
> +		if (order && pgdat_needs_compaction &&
> +				this_reclaimed > nr_to_reclaim)
> +			compact_pgdat(pgdat, order);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Raise priority if scanning rate is too low or there was no
>  		 * progress in reclaiming pages
>  		 */
> -		if (raise_priority || sc.nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed == 0)
> +		if (raise_priority || !this_reclaimed)
>  			sc.priority--;
>  	} while (sc.priority >= 0 &&
>  		 !pgdat_balanced(pgdat, order, *classzone_idx));
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * If kswapd was reclaiming at a higher order, it has the option of
> -	 * sleeping without all zones being balanced. Before it does, it must
> -	 * ensure that the watermarks for order-0 on *all* zones are met and
> -	 * that the congestion flags are cleared. The congestion flag must
> -	 * be cleared as kswapd is the only mechanism that clears the flag
> -	 * and it is potentially going to sleep here.
> -	 */
> -	if (order) {
> -		int zones_need_compaction = 1;
> -
> -		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> -			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> -
> -			if (!populated_zone(zone))
> -				continue;
> -
> -			/* Check if the memory needs to be defragmented. */
> -			if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, order,
> -				    low_wmark_pages(zone), *classzone_idx, 0))
> -				zones_need_compaction = 0;
> -		}
> -
> -		if (zones_need_compaction)
> -			compact_pgdat(pgdat, order);
> -	}
> -
>  out:
>  	/*
>  	 * Return the order we were reclaiming at so prepare_kswapd_sleep()
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-21 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-17 13:04 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: vmscan: Limit the number of pages kswapd reclaims at each priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 23:53   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19  9:55     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:16       ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:59         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-20 16:18   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21  0:52     ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  0:08       ` Will Huck
2013-03-21  9:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 12:59       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21  0:51   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 15:57   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 16:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  0:05     ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  3:52       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  3:56         ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  4:59           ` Will Huck
2013-03-22 13:01             ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-05  0:05               ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:32                 ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:35                 ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:54         ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:58         ` Will Huck
2013-04-12  5:46           ` Ric Mason
2013-04-12  9:34             ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12 13:40               ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-25  9:07   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-25  9:13     ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-28 22:31       ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-29  8:22         ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-30 22:07           ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-02 11:15             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: vmscan: Obey proportional scanning requirements for kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:39   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:08     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  1:10   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21  9:54     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 14:01   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 14:31     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:07       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:34         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  7:54           ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22  8:37             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 10:04               ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 10:47                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 16:25   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 18:02     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 16:53       ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 18:25         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 19:09           ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 19:46             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd priority loop Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:36   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:09     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18  7:02   ` Hillf Danton
2013-03-19 10:01     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 23:58   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:12     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19  3:08   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19  8:23     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-19 10:14     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:26       ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 11:01         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 14:54   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:26     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:38       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat based on reclaim progress Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:11   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-19 10:19     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:11   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-18 11:35   ` Hillf Danton
2013-03-19 10:27     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:32   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-03-21 15:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:50       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: vmscan: Do not allow kswapd to scan at maximum priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  1:20   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 10:12     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 12:30       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 15:48   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd writeback pages based on dirty pages encountered, not priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:42   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:11     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 17:53       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 18:15         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 18:21           ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-18 11:08   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-18 11:08   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-19 10:35     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:49   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:19     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 15:40       ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-19 11:06         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:37   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:57     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:58   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-18 11:58   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-19 10:58     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 16:32   ` [PATCH 07/10 -v2r1] " Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:42   ` [PATCH 07/10] " Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  8:27     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd shrink slab only once per priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:53   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-21 16:47   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 19:47   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-09  6:53   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09  8:41     ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-09 11:13     ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  1:07       ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10  5:23         ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-11  9:53         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  5:21       ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-11 10:01         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 10:29           ` Ric Mason
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: vmscan: Check if kswapd should writepage " Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 16:58   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:07     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 19:52   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:55   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:25     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 17:18   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:13     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd Damien Wyart
2013-03-21 10:54   ` Zlatko Calusic
2013-03-21 11:48     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 11:20   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 14:37 ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-24 19:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-25  8:17   ` Michal Hocko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-09 11:06 [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2 Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:06 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat based on reclaim progress Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  8:05   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-10 13:57     ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12  2:46   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-11 19:57 [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V3 Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 19:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat based on reclaim progress Mel Gorman
2013-04-18 15:09   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130321153231.GP6094@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=dormando@rydia.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
    --cc=zcalusic@bitsync.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).