linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@bitsync.net>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	dormando <dormando@rydia.net>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone()
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:13:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321181356.GO1878@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321171804.GW6094@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:18:04PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 17-03-13 13:04:16, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Kswapd reclaims only single pages with compaction enabled. Trying
> > +	 * too hard to reclaim until contiguous free pages have become
> > +	 * available can hurt performance by evicting too much useful data
> > +	 * from memory. Do not reclaim more than needed for compaction.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && sc->order &&
> > +			compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order) !=
> > +				COMPACT_SKIPPED)
> > +		testorder = 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We put equal pressure on every zone, unless one zone has way too
> > +	 * many pages free already. The "too many pages" is defined as the
> > +	 * high wmark plus a "gap" where the gap is either the low
> > +	 * watermark or 1% of the zone, whichever is smaller.
> > +	 */
> > +	balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone),
> > +		(zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) /
> > +		KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If there is no low memory pressure or the zone is balanced then no
> > +	 * reclaim is necessary
> > +	 */
> > +	lowmem_pressure = (buffer_heads_over_limit && is_highmem(zone));
> > +	if (!(lowmem_pressure || !zone_balanced(zone, testorder,
> > +						balance_gap, classzone_idx)))
> 
> if (!lowmem_pressure && zone_balanced) would be less cryptic I guess
> 

It would.

> > +		return true;
> > +
> >  	shrink_zone(zone, sc);
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -2689,6 +2724,16 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
> >  
> >  	zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_WRITEBACK);
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If a zone reaches its high watermark, consider it to be no longer
> > +	 * congested. It's possible there are dirty pages backed by congested
> > +	 * BDIs but as pressure is relieved, speculatively avoid congestion
> > +	 * waits.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!zone->all_unreclaimable &&
> > +	    zone_balanced(zone, testorder, 0, classzone_idx))
> > +		zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
> > +
> >  	return sc->nr_scanned >= sc->nr_to_reclaim;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2821,8 +2866,6 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> >  		 */
> >  		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> >  			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> > -			int testorder;
> > -			unsigned long balance_gap;
> >  
> >  			if (!populated_zone(zone))
> >  				continue;
> > @@ -2843,61 +2886,16 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> >  			sc.nr_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed;
> >  
> >  			/*
> > -			 * We put equal pressure on every zone, unless
> > -			 * one zone has way too many pages free
> > -			 * already. The "too many pages" is defined
> > -			 * as the high wmark plus a "gap" where the
> > -			 * gap is either the low watermark or 1%
> > -			 * of the zone, whichever is smaller.
> > -			 */
> > -			balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone),
> > -				(zone->managed_pages +
> > -					KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) /
> > -				KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO);
> > -			/*
> > -			 * Kswapd reclaims only single pages with compaction
> > -			 * enabled. Trying too hard to reclaim until contiguous
> > -			 * free pages have become available can hurt performance
> > -			 * by evicting too much useful data from memory.
> > -			 * Do not reclaim more than needed for compaction.
> > +			 * There should be no need to raise the scanning
> > +			 * priority if enough pages are already being scanned
> > +			 * that that high watermark would be met at 100%
> > +			 * efficiency.
> >  			 */
> > -			testorder = order;
> > -			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && order &&
> > -					compaction_suitable(zone, order) !=
> > -						COMPACT_SKIPPED)
> > -				testorder = 0;
> > -
> > -			if ((buffer_heads_over_limit && is_highmem_idx(i)) ||
> > -			    !zone_balanced(zone, testorder,
> > -					   balance_gap, end_zone)) {
> > -				/*
> > -				 * There should be no need to raise the
> > -				 * scanning priority if enough pages are
> > -				 * already being scanned that that high
> > -				 * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
> > -				 */
> > -				if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, &sc,
> > +			if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, end_zone, &sc,
> >  						lru_pages, shrinking_slab))
> >  					raise_priority = false;
> >  
> > -				nr_to_reclaim += sc.nr_to_reclaim;
> > -			}
> > -
> > -			if (zone->all_unreclaimable) {
> > -				if (end_zone && end_zone == i)
> > -					end_zone--;
> > -				continue;
> > -			}
> > -
> > -			if (zone_balanced(zone, testorder, 0, end_zone))
> > -				/*
> > -				 * If a zone reaches its high watermark,
> > -				 * consider it to be no longer congested. It's
> > -				 * possible there are dirty pages backed by
> > -				 * congested BDIs but as pressure is relieved,
> > -				 * speculatively avoid congestion waits
> > -				 */
> > -				zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
> > +			nr_to_reclaim += sc.nr_to_reclaim;
> >  		}
> 
> nr_to_reclaim is updated if the zone is balanced an no reclaim is done
> which break compaction condition AFAICS.
> 

True, it only makes sense to account for the pages it actually attempted
to reclaim. Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-21 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-17 13:04 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: vmscan: Limit the number of pages kswapd reclaims at each priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 23:53   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19  9:55     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:16       ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:59         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-20 16:18   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21  0:52     ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  0:08       ` Will Huck
2013-03-21  9:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 12:59       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21  0:51   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 15:57   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 16:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  0:05     ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  3:52       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  3:56         ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  4:59           ` Will Huck
2013-03-22 13:01             ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-05  0:05               ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:32                 ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:35                 ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:54         ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:58         ` Will Huck
2013-04-12  5:46           ` Ric Mason
2013-04-12  9:34             ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12 13:40               ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-25  9:07   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-25  9:13     ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-28 22:31       ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-29  8:22         ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-30 22:07           ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-02 11:15             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: vmscan: Obey proportional scanning requirements for kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:39   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:08     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  1:10   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21  9:54     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 14:01   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 14:31     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:07       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:34         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  7:54           ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22  8:37             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 10:04               ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 10:47                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 16:25   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 18:02     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 16:53       ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 18:25         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 19:09           ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 19:46             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd priority loop Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:36   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:09     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18  7:02   ` Hillf Danton
2013-03-19 10:01     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 23:58   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:12     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19  3:08   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19  8:23     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-19 10:14     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:26       ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 11:01         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 14:54   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:26     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:38       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat based on reclaim progress Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:11   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-18 11:11   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-19 10:19     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:35   ` Hillf Danton
2013-03-19 10:27     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:32   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:50       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: vmscan: Do not allow kswapd to scan at maximum priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  1:20   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 10:12     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 12:30       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 15:48   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd writeback pages based on dirty pages encountered, not priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:42   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:11     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 17:53       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 18:15         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 18:21           ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-18 11:08   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-18 11:08   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-19 10:35     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:49   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:19     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 15:40       ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-19 11:06         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:37   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:57     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:58   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-18 11:58   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-19 10:58     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 16:32   ` [PATCH 07/10 -v2r1] " Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:42   ` [PATCH 07/10] " Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  8:27     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd shrink slab only once per priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:53   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-21 16:47   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 19:47   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-09  6:53   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09  8:41     ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-09 11:13     ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  1:07       ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10  5:23         ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-11  9:53         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  5:21       ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-11 10:01         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 10:29           ` Ric Mason
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: vmscan: Check if kswapd should writepage " Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 16:58   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:07     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 19:52   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:55   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:25     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 17:18   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:13     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2013-03-21 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd Damien Wyart
2013-03-21 10:54   ` Zlatko Calusic
2013-03-21 11:48     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 11:20   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 14:37 ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-24 19:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-25  8:17   ` Michal Hocko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-09 11:06 [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2 Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:07 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2013-04-12  2:56   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-11 19:57 [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V3 Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 19:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2013-04-18 16:56   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130321181356.GO1878@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=dormando@rydia.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
    --cc=zcalusic@bitsync.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).