From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix memcg_cache_name() to use cgroup_name()
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:06:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130322100609.GI31457@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514C2C72.5090402@parallels.com>
On Fri 22-03-13 14:03:30, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 03/22/2013 01:48 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 22-03-13 13:41:40, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> On 03/22/2013 01:31 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> On Fri 22-03-13 12:22:23, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >>>> On 03/22/2013 12:17 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> >>>>>> GFP_TEMPORARY groups short lived allocations but the mem cache is not
> >>>>>>> an ideal candidate of this type of allocations..
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> I'm not sure I'm following you...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> char *memcg_cache_name()
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> char *name = alloc();
> >>>>> return name;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> kmem_cache_dup()
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> name = memcg_cache_name();
> >>>>> kmem_cache_create_memcg(name);
> >>>>> free(name);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Isn't this a short lived allocation?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for identifying and fixing this.
> >>>>
> >>>> Li is right. The cache name will live long, but this is because the
> >>>> slab/slub caches will strdup it internally. So the actual memcg
> >>>> allocation is short lived.
> >>>
> >>> OK, I have totally missed that. Sorry about the confusion. Then all the
> >>> churn around the allocation is pointless, no?
> >>> What about:
> >>
> >> If we're really not concerned about stack, then yes. Even if always
> >> running from workqueues, a PAGE_SIZEd stack variable seems risky to me.
> >
> > This is not on stack. It is static
> >
> Ah, right, I totally missed that. And then you're taking the mutex.
>
> But actually, you don't need to take the mutex. All calls to
> kmem_cache_dup are protected by the memcg_cache_mutex.
Yes and I am not taking that mutex. I've just added lockdep assert to
make sure that this still holds true.
> So you should be able to just use the buffer without further problems.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-22 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 1:22 [PATCH] memcg: fix memcg_cache_name() to use cgroup_name() Li Zefan
2013-03-21 9:08 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 10:22 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 1:22 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-22 8:07 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 8:17 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-22 8:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-22 9:31 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 9:41 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-22 9:48 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 10:03 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-22 10:06 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-03-22 10:25 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-22 10:56 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-24 7:34 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-25 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-24 7:33 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-25 9:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-26 7:52 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-26 8:10 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-26 8:35 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-26 8:43 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-26 9:02 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-27 1:15 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-27 8:37 ` Michal Hocko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-27 8:36 Michal Hocko
2013-03-27 14:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-27 15:11 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-27 15:19 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-27 15:32 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-27 17:32 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-28 7:48 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-02 8:26 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-03 21:33 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04 7:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-27 15:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-27 15:47 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-27 16:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-27 16:19 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-27 16:21 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-27 16:27 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-28 7:22 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130322100609.GI31457@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).