From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: remove swapcache page early
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:05:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130327070549.GB13897@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5152807D.5010905@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi Kame,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:15:41PM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2013/03/27 11:22), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Swap subsystem does lazy swap slot free with expecting the page
> > would be swapped out again so we can't avoid unnecessary write.
> >
> > But the problem in in-memory swap is that it consumes memory space
> > until vm_swap_full(ie, used half of all of swap device) condition
> > meet. It could be bad if we use multiple swap device, small in-memory swap
> > and big storage swap or in-memory swap alone.
> >
> > This patch changes vm_swap_full logic slightly so it could free
> > swap slot early if the backed device is really fast.
> > For it, I used SWP_SOLIDSTATE but It might be controversial.
> > So let's add Ccing Shaohua and Hugh.
> > If it's a problem for SSD, I'd like to create new type SWP_INMEMORY
> > or something for z* family.
> >
> > Other problem is zram is block device so that it can set SWP_INMEMORY
> > or SWP_SOLIDSTATE easily(ie, actually, zram is already done) but
> > I have no idea to use it for frontswap.
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> Another thinking....in what case, in what system configuration,
> vm_swap_full() should return false and delay swp_entry freeing ?
It's a really good question I had have in mind from long time ago.
If I catch your point properly, your question is "Couldn't we remove
vm_swap_full logic?"
If so, the answer is "I have no idea and would like to ask it
to Hugh".
Academically, it does make sense swap-out page is unlikely to be
working set so it could be swap out again and I believe it was
merged since we had the workload could be enhanced by the logic
at that time.
And I think it's not easy to prove it's useless thesedays because
I couldn't have all recent workloads over the world so I'd like to
avoid such adventure. :)
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 2:22 [RFC] mm: remove swapcache page early Minchan Kim
2013-03-27 5:03 ` Kyungmin Park
2013-03-27 5:15 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-27 7:05 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2013-03-27 17:19 ` Seth Jennings
2013-03-28 1:36 ` Minchan Kim
2013-03-27 21:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-27 22:24 ` Dan Magenheimer
2013-03-27 23:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-28 1:18 ` Minchan Kim
2013-03-28 1:54 ` Shaohua Li
2013-03-28 17:35 ` Dan Magenheimer
2013-03-28 1:07 ` Minchan Kim
2013-03-28 18:19 ` Dan Magenheimer
2013-03-29 1:18 ` Minchan Kim
2013-03-29 20:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-04-02 2:04 ` Minchan Kim
2013-04-02 5:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-04-02 5:56 ` Minchan Kim
2013-03-28 0:36 ` Minchan Kim
2013-04-02 13:40 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-07 7:26 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 1:48 ` Minchan Kim
2013-04-08 1:51 ` Simon Jeons
[not found] <<1364350932-12853-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
2013-03-27 21:20 ` Dan Magenheimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130327070549.GB13897@blaptop \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=konrad@darnok.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).