From: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
oleg@redhat.com, kamaleshb@in.ibm.com, hechjie@cn.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 22:52:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402205215.GD3314@dhcp-26-164.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515B3F98.5020101@zytor.com>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:29:12PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 12:10 PM, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> >
> > Hi, this is exactly what the patch is doing imho. Note that the
> > valid_phys_addr_range(), which is using the high_memory, is the same as the
> > default one in drivers/char/mem.c(#ifndef ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE). I
> > just added x86 specific check for valid_mmap_phys_addr_range and moved both
> > functions to arch/x86/mm/mmap.c, rather then modifying the default generic ones.
> > This is how other archs(arm) are doing it.
> >
> > Also valid_phys_addr_range is used just in read|write_mem and
> > valid_mmap_phys_addr_range is checked in mmap_mem and it calls phys_addr_valid
> >
> > static inline int phys_addr_valid(resource_size_t addr)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> > return !(addr >> boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits);
> > #else
> > return 1;
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > I for sure could overlooked something, but this seems right to me.
> >
>
> OK, this is really confusing ... which isn't a *huge* surprise (the
> entire /dev/mem code has some gigantic bugs in it.)
>
> I think I need to do more of an in-depth review. The other question is
> why we don't call phys_addr_valid() everywhere.
I'm not going to pretend I understand the code, but IMHO the
valid_phys_addr_range and valid_mmap_phys_addr_range in drivers/char/mem.c are
generic for all archs. If some arch wants specific version of those functions it
defines them in the arch specific code and define ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE.
The phys_addr_valid is x86 specific defined in arch/x86/mm/physaddr.h, so IMHO
it cannot be used in the generic checks. For example ARM has it's specific
checks in arch/arm/mm/mmap.c.
I reused phys_addr_valid because it is already used in ioremap(__ioremap_caller)
for the same purpose imho.
Thank you for looking into this.
>
> -hpa
>
>
--
Frantisek Hrbata
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-02 12:28 [PATCH] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-02 18:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-02 18:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-02 19:10 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-02 20:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-02 20:52 ` Frantisek Hrbata [this message]
2013-04-24 11:36 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-04 1:11 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04 1:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04 1:17 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04 1:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04 1:53 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04 2:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04 2:17 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04 5:20 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-11 2:40 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-11 2:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-11 2:58 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-03 2:46 ` Cheng Jie He
2013-04-26 5:21 ` Will Huck
2013-04-26 15:35 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-27 7:00 ` Will Huck
2013-04-27 19:13 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-28 3:17 ` Will Huck
2013-04-28 4:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28 8:03 ` Will Huck
2013-05-01 18:19 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-01 19:04 ` Frantisek Hrbata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130402205215.GD3314@dhcp-26-164.brq.redhat.com \
--to=fhrbata@redhat.com \
--cc=hechjie@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kamaleshb@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).