linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
	oleg@redhat.com, kamaleshb@in.ibm.com, hechjie@cn.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 22:52:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402205215.GD3314@dhcp-26-164.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515B3F98.5020101@zytor.com>

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:29:12PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 12:10 PM, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > 
> > Hi, this is exactly what the patch is doing imho. Note that the
> > valid_phys_addr_range(), which is using the high_memory, is the same as the
> > default one in drivers/char/mem.c(#ifndef ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE). I
> > just added x86 specific check for valid_mmap_phys_addr_range and moved both
> > functions to arch/x86/mm/mmap.c, rather then modifying the default generic ones.
> > This is how other archs(arm) are doing it.
> > 
> > Also valid_phys_addr_range is used just in read|write_mem and
> > valid_mmap_phys_addr_range is checked in mmap_mem and it calls phys_addr_valid
> > 
> > static inline int phys_addr_valid(resource_size_t addr)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> > 	return !(addr >> boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits);
> > #else
> >         return 1;
> > #endif
> > }                          
> > 
> > I for sure could overlooked something, but this seems right to me.
> > 
> 
> OK, this is really confusing ... which isn't a *huge* surprise (the
> entire /dev/mem code has some gigantic bugs in it.)
> 
> I think I need to do more of an in-depth review.  The other question is
> why we don't call phys_addr_valid() everywhere.

I'm not going to pretend I understand the code, but IMHO the
valid_phys_addr_range and valid_mmap_phys_addr_range in drivers/char/mem.c are
generic for all archs. If some arch wants specific version of those functions it
defines them in the arch specific code and define ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE.
The phys_addr_valid is x86 specific defined in arch/x86/mm/physaddr.h, so IMHO
it cannot be used in the generic checks. For example ARM has it's specific
checks in arch/arm/mm/mmap.c.

I reused phys_addr_valid because it is already used in ioremap(__ioremap_caller)
for the same purpose imho.

Thank you for looking into this.

> 
> 	-hpa
> 
> 

-- 
Frantisek Hrbata

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-02 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-02 12:28 [PATCH] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-02 18:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-02 18:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-02 19:10   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-02 20:29     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-02 20:52       ` Frantisek Hrbata [this message]
2013-04-24 11:36       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-04  1:11   ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  1:13     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04  1:17       ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  1:32         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04  1:53           ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  2:14             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04  2:17               ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  5:20           ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-11  2:40       ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-11  2:48         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-11  2:58           ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-03  2:46 ` Cheng Jie He
2013-04-26  5:21 ` Will Huck
2013-04-26 15:35   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-27  7:00     ` Will Huck
2013-04-27 19:13       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-28  3:17         ` Will Huck
2013-04-28  4:00           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28  8:03             ` Will Huck
2013-05-01 18:19           ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-01 19:04             ` Frantisek Hrbata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130402205215.GD3314@dhcp-26-164.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=fhrbata@redhat.com \
    --cc=hechjie@cn.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kamaleshb@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).