From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx142.postini.com [74.125.245.142]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C92426B0005 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:22:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id um15so1470098pbc.8 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:22:13 -0700 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] cgroup: make sure parent won't be destroyed before its children Message-ID: <20130404152213.GL9425@htj.dyndns.org> References: <515BF233.6070308@huawei.com> <515BF2A4.1070703@huawei.com> <20130404113750.GH29911@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20130404133706.GA9425@htj.dyndns.org> <20130404152028.GK29911@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130404152028.GK29911@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: Li Zefan , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Cgroups , Glauber Costa , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Johannes Weiner On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:20:28PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > But what harm does an additional reference do? > > No harm at all. I just wanted to be sure that this is not yet another > "for memcg" hack. So if this is useful for other controllers then I have > no objections of course. I think it makes sense in general, so let's do it in cgroup core. I suppose it'd be easier for this to be routed together with other memcg changes? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org