linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@bitsync.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	dormando <dormando@rydia.net>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:52:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130412195152.GK11656@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130412193947.GJ11656@suse.de>

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:40:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:55:13PM +0200, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> > On 09.04.2013 13:06, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > - The only slightly negative thing I observed is that with the patch
> > applied kswapd burns 10x - 20x more CPU. So instead of about 15
> > seconds, it has now spent more than 4 minutes on one particular
> > machine with a quite steady load (after about 12 days of uptime).
> > Admittedly, that's still nothing too alarming, but...
> > 
> 
> Would you happen to know what circumstances trigger the higher CPU
> usage?
> 

There is also a slight possibility it has been fixed in V3 by the
proportional scanning changes. In my own parallelio tests I got the
following kswapd CPU times from top.

3.9.0-rc6-vanilla           0:05.21
3.9.0-rc6-lessdisrupt-v2r11 0:07.44
3.9.0-rc6-lessdisrupt-v3r6  0:03.21

In v2, I did see slightly higher CPU usage but it was reduced in v3. For
a general set of page reclaim tests I got

3.9.0-rc6-vanilla-micro     3:09.51
3.9.0-rc6-lessdisrupt-v2r11 2:57.78
3.9.0-rc6-lessdisrupt-v3r6  1:10.05

In that case, v2 was comparable so unfortunately I was never seeing the
10-20x more CPU that you got.

Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-12 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-09 11:06 [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2 Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:06 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: vmscan: Limit the number of pages kswapd reclaims at each priority Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 13:27   ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-10  6:47   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-09 11:06 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: vmscan: Obey proportional scanning requirements for kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  7:16   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-10 14:08     ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-11  0:14       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-11  9:09         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:06 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd priority loop Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  7:47   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-10 13:29     ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12  2:45   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-09 11:06 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat based on reclaim progress Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  8:05   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-04-10 13:57     ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12  2:46   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-09 11:07 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: vmscan: Do not allow kswapd to scan at maximum priority Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:07 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd writeback pages based on dirty pages encountered, not priority Mel Gorman
2013-04-12  2:51   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-09 11:07 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback Mel Gorman
2013-04-12  2:54   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-09 11:07 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd shrink slab only once per priority Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:07 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: vmscan: Check if kswapd should writepage once per pgdat scan Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:07 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2013-04-12  2:56   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-09 17:27 ` [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2 Christoph Lameter
2013-04-10 14:14   ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-10 22:28     ` dormando
2013-04-10 23:46       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-11  9:10       ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 20:13         ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-11 20:55 ` Zlatko Calusic
2013-04-12 19:40   ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12 19:52     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2013-04-12 20:07     ` Zlatko Calusic
2013-04-12 20:41       ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12 21:14         ` Zlatko Calusic
2013-04-22  6:37       ` Zlatko Calusic
2013-04-22  6:43         ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-22  6:54           ` Zlatko Calusic
2013-04-22  7:12             ` Simon Jeons

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130412195152.GK11656@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dormando@rydia.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
    --cc=zcalusic@bitsync.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).