linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Subject: Re: memcg: softlimit on internal nodes
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:51:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130423125101.GE8001@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANN689Hz5A+iMM3T76-8RCh8YDnoGrYBvtjL_+cXaYRR0OkGRQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue 23-04-13 02:58:19, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
[...]
> However, your proposal takes that weak guarantee away as soon as one
> tries to use cgroup hierarchies with it, because it reclaims from
> every child cgroup as soon as the parent hits its soft limit.

Reading this again I am really getting confused. The primary objection
used to be that under-soft-limit inter-node subtree shouldn't be
reclaimed although there are children over their soft limits. Now we
have moved to over-limit inder-node shouldn't hammer its subtree?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-23 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-20  0:26 memcg: softlimit on internal nodes Tejun Heo
2013-04-20  0:42 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-20  3:35   ` Greg Thelen
2013-04-21  1:53     ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-20  3:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-21  2:23   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-21  8:55     ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-04-22  4:24       ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-22  7:14         ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-04-22 14:48           ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-22 15:37         ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-22 15:46           ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-22 15:54             ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-22 16:01               ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-23  9:58               ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-04-23 10:17                 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-23 11:40                   ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-23 11:54                     ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-23 12:51                     ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-04-23 13:06                       ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-23 13:13                         ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-23 13:28                           ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-23 11:32                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-23 12:45                   ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-04-23 12:59                     ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-23 12:51                 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-04-21 12:46     ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-22  4:39       ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-22 15:19         ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-22 15:57           ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-22 15:57             ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-22 16:20             ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-22 18:30               ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-23  9:29                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-23 17:09                   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-26 11:51                     ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-26 18:37                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-29 15:27                         ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-23  9:33                 ` [RFC v2 0/4] soft limit rework Michal Hocko
2013-04-23  9:33                   ` [RFC v2 1/4] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Michal Hocko
2013-04-23  9:33                   ` [RFC v2 2/4] memcg: Get rid of soft-limit tree infrastructure Michal Hocko
2013-04-23  9:33                   ` [RFC v2 3/4] vmscan, memcg: Do softlimit reclaim also for targeted reclaim Michal Hocko
2013-04-23  9:33                   ` [RFC v2 4/4] memcg: Ignore soft limit until it is explicitly specified Michal Hocko
2013-04-24 21:45                 ` memcg: softlimit on internal nodes Johannes Weiner
2013-04-25  0:33                   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-29 18:39                     ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130423125101.GE8001@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).