From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx171.postini.com [74.125.245.171]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6A4B6B0034 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 01:29:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 15:29:34 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/31] dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks Message-ID: <20130510052934.GR23072@dastard> References: <1368079608-5611-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> <1368079608-5611-5-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1368079608-5611-5-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , hughd@google.com, Greg Thelen , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:06:21AM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > With the dentry LRUs being per-sb structures, there is no real need > for a global dentry_lru_lock. The locking can be made more > fine-grained by moving to a per-sb LRU lock, isolating the LRU > operations of different filesytsems completely from each other. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > Acked-by: Mel Gorman Doesn't apply to a current linus tree. What is this patchset based on? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org