From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx112.postini.com [74.125.245.112]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 144D56B0032 for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 15:32:36 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] ARM64: mm: HugeTLB support. Message-ID: <20130516143236.GD18308@arm.com> References: <1368006763-30774-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> <1368006763-30774-10-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1368006763-30774-10-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Steve Capper Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Michal Hocko , Ken Chen , Mel Gorman , Will Deacon , "patches@linaro.org" On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Steve Capper wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h ... > +static inline int pud_large(pud_t pud) > +{ > + return !(pud_val(pud) & PUD_TABLE_BIT); > +} I already commented on this - do we really need pud_large() which is the same as pud_huge()? It's only defined on x86 and can be safely replaced with pud_huge(). > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c > @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ ... > +int pmd_huge(pmd_t pmd) > +{ > + return !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT); > +} > + > +int pud_huge(pud_t pud) > +{ > + return !(pud_val(pud) & PUD_TABLE_BIT); > +} You could even go further and make pud/pmd_huge static inline functions for slightly better efficiency (needs changing in the linux/hugetlb.h header). -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org