From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cpw@sgi.com,
kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, lisa.mitchell@hp.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, riel@redhat.com, walken@google.com,
hughd@google.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] vmcore: allocate ELF note segment in the 2nd kernel vmalloc memory
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 15:21:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130522192122.GE5332@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130522025606.12215.36133.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:56:06AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
[..]
> -/* Merges all the PT_NOTE headers into one. */
> -static int __init merge_note_headers_elf64(char *elfptr, size_t *elfsz,
> - struct list_head *vc_list)
> +/**
> + * get_note_number_and_size_elf64 - get the number of PT_NOTE program
> + * headers and sum of real size of their ELF note segment headers and
> + * data.
> + *
> + * @ehdr_ptr: ELF header
> + * @nr_ptnotep: buffer for the number of PT_NOTE program headers
> + * @phdr_szp: buffer for size of unique PT_NOTE program header
How about calling them nr_ptnote and sz_ptnote respectively. Just feels
more readable to me.
[..]
> +static int __init copy_notes_elf64(const Elf64_Ehdr *ehdr_ptr, char *notes_buf)
> +{
> + int i, rc=0;
> + Elf64_Phdr *phdr_ptr;
> + Elf64_Nhdr *nhdr_ptr;
> + u64 phdr_sz = 0;
> +
> + phdr_ptr = (Elf64_Phdr*)(ehdr_ptr + 1);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ehdr_ptr->e_phnum; i++, phdr_ptr++) {
> + int j;
> + void *notes_section;
> + u64 offset, max_sz, sz, real_sz = 0;
> + if (phdr_ptr->p_type != PT_NOTE)
> + continue;
> + max_sz = phdr_ptr->p_memsz;
> + offset = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
> + notes_section = kmalloc(max_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!notes_section)
> return -ENOMEM;
> + rc = read_from_oldmem(notes_section, max_sz, &offset, 0);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + kfree(notes_section);
> + return rc;
> + }
> + nhdr_ptr = notes_section;
> + for (j = 0; j < max_sz; j += sz) {
> + if (nhdr_ptr->n_namesz == 0)
> + break;
> + sz = sizeof(Elf64_Nhdr) +
> + ((nhdr_ptr->n_namesz + 3) & ~3) +
> + ((nhdr_ptr->n_descsz + 3) & ~3);
> + real_sz += sz;
> + nhdr_ptr = (Elf64_Nhdr*)((char*)nhdr_ptr + sz);
> + }
> + offset = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
> + rc = read_from_oldmem(notes_buf + phdr_sz, real_sz,
> + &offset, 0);
We have already copied notes in notes_section. So there is no need to
do read_from_oldmem again.
Also going through notes size multiple times seems unnecessary. How
about writing a function which goes through notes once and updates
the size in PT_NOTE header p_memsz field. And then later
copy_notes_elf64() and get_note_number_and_size_elf64() can simply
make use of it.
Also copy_notes_elf64() does not have to cpy notes temporarily in
notes_section memory in that case.
So how about something like, update_note_header_size().
[..]
> + vm = find_vm_area(*notes_buf);
> + BUG_ON(!vm);
> + vm->flags |= VM_USERMAP;
> +
This code is new and is not related to copying of notes. Can you please
move it into a separate patch with explanation.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 2:55 [PATCH v7 0/8] kdump, vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 2:55 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] vmcore: clean up read_vmcore() HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 2:55 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] vmcore: allocate buffer for ELF headers on page-size alignment HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 14:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22 2:55 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] vmcore: treat memory chunks referenced by PT_LOAD program header entries in page-size boundary in vmcore_list HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 2:55 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] vmalloc: make find_vm_area check in range HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] vmalloc: introduce remap_vmalloc_range_partial HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] vmcore: allocate ELF note segment in the 2nd kernel vmalloc memory HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 19:21 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-05-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] vmcore: calculate vmcore file size from buffer size and total size of vmcore objects HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 20:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22 2:56 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130522192122.GE5332@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jingbai.ma@hp.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lisa.mitchell@hp.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).