From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx153.postini.com [74.125.245.153]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D12B6B016B for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 02:32:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id t59so7228343wes.30 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 23:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 08:32:05 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: Fix RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Message-ID: <20130530063205.GA5310@gmail.com> References: <20130523152458.GD23650@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0000013ed2297ba8-467d474a-7068-45b3-9fa3-82641e6aa363-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130523163901.GG23650@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0000013ed28b638a-066d7dc7-b590-49f8-9423-badb9537b8b6-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130524140114.GK23650@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <0000013ed732b615-748f574f-ccb8-4de7-bbe4-d85d1cbf0c9d-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130527064834.GA2781@laptop> <0000013eec0006ee-0f8caf7b-cc94-4f54-ae38-0ca6623b7841-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20130529075845.GA24506@gmail.com> <51A65CC0.3050800@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51A65CC0.3050800@gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Christoph Lameter , Peter Zijlstra , Al Viro , Vince Weaver , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , trinity@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, roland@kernel.org, infinipath@qlogic.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Or Gerlitz , Hugh Dickins * KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Hi > > I'm unhappy you guys uses offensive word so much. Please cool down all > you guys. :-/ In fact, _BOTH_ the behavior before and after Cristoph's > patch doesn't have cleaner semantics. Erm, this feature _regressed_ after the patch. All other concerns are secondary. What's so difficult to understand about that? > And PeterZ proposed make new cleaner one rather than revert. No need to > hassle. Sorry, that's not how we deal with regressions upstream... I've been pretty polite in fact, compared to say Linus - someone should put a politically correct summary of: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/22/456 https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/1113 into Documentation/, people keep forgetting about it. I'm sorry if being direct and to the point offends you [no, not really], this discussion got _way_ off the real track it should be on: that this is a _regression_. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org