linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
	Hyunhee Kim <hyunhee.kim@samsung.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, 'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: event control at vmpressure.
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:10:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130611091036.466f9743@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130611062124.GA24031@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:21:24 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:

> On Mon 10-06-13 17:17:47, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:12:58PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > +		if (level >= ev->level && level != vmpr->current_level) {
> > > >  			eventfd_signal(ev->efd, 1);
> > > >  			signalled = true;
> > > > +			vmpr->current_level = level;
> > > 
> > > This would mean that you send a signal for, say, VMPRESSURE_LOW, then
> > > the reclaim finishes and two days later when you hit the reclaim again
> > > you would simply miss the event, right?
> > > 
> > > So, unless I am missing something, then this is plain wrong.
> > 
> > Yup, in it current version, it is not acceptable. For example, sometimes
> > we do want to see all the _LOW events, since _LOW level shows not just the
> > level itself, but the activity (i.e. reclaiming process).
> > 
> > There are a few ways to make both parties happy, though.
> > 
> > If the app wants to implement the time-based throttling, then just close
> > the fd and sleep for needed amount of time (or do not read from the
> > eventfd -- kernel then will just increment the eventfd counter, so there
> > won't be context switches at the least).
> 
> That makes sense to me.
> 
> > Doing the time-based throttling in the kernel won't buy us much, I
> > believe.
> 
> Yes.
>  
> > Or, if you still want the "one-shot"/"edge-triggered" events (which might
> > make perfect sense for medium and critical levels), then I'd propose to
> > add some additional flag when you register the event, so that the old
> > behaviour would be still available for those who need it. This approach I
> > think is the best one.
> 
> Hmm, how would one-shot even differ from a single open, register, read
> and close?

Agreed.

A different solution would be to have a simple state machine and notify
user-space on state transitions.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-11 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-10 11:14 [PATCH] memcg: event control at vmpressure Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-10 14:09 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-06-10 15:12 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-11  0:17   ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-11  1:01     ` Kyungmin Park
2013-06-11  6:21     ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-11  8:49       ` [PATCH v2] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-11 12:59         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-12  5:42           ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-12 13:09             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-11 13:10       ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2013-06-11 13:13       ` [PATCH] " Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130611091036.466f9743@redhat.com \
    --to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=anton@enomsg.org \
    --cc=hyunhee.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).