linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Robert Love <rlove@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>, Taras Glek <tglek@mozilla.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dgiani@mozilla.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] vrange: Clear volatility on new mmaps
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:28:15 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130613062815.GB5209@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371010971-15647-5-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>

Hey John,

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:22:47PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> At lsf-mm, the issue was brought up that there is a precedence with
> interfaces like mlock, such that new mappings in a pre-existing range
> do no inherit the mlock state.
> 
> This is mostly because mlock only modifies the existing vmas, and so
> any new mmaps create new vmas, which won't be mlocked.
> 
> Since volatility is not stored in the vma (for good cause, specfically
> as we'd have to have manage file volatility differently from anonymous
> and we're likely to manage volatility on small chunks of memory, which
> would cause lots of vma splitting and churn), this patch clears volatilty
> on new mappings, to ensure that we don't inherit volatility if memory in
> an existing volatile range is unmapped and then re-mapped with something
> else.
> 
> Thus, this patch forces any volatility to be cleared on mmap.

If we have lots of node on vroot but it doesn't include newly mmmaping
vma range, it's purely unnecessary cost and that's never what we want.

> 
> XXX: We expect this patch to be not well loved by mm folks, and are open
> to alternative methods here. Its more of a place holder to address
> the issue from lsf-mm and hopefully will spur some further discussion.

Another idea is we can add "bool is_vrange" in struct vm_area_struct.
It is protected by vrange_lock. The scenario is following as,

When do_vrange is called with VRANGE_VOLATILE, it iterates vmas
and mark the vma->is_vrange to true. So, we can avoid tree traversal
if the is_vrange is false when munmap is called and newly mmaped vma
doesn't need to clear any volatility.

And it would help the performance of purging path to find that a page
is volatile page or not(for now, it is traversing on vroot to find it
but we could do it easily via checking the vma->is_vrange).

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-13  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-12  4:22 [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?) John Stultz
2013-06-12  4:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] vrange: Add basic data structure and functions John Stultz
2013-06-12  4:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] vrange: Add vrange support for file address_spaces John Stultz
2013-06-12  4:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] vrange: Add vrange support to mm_structs John Stultz
2013-06-12  4:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] vrange: Clear volatility on new mmaps John Stultz
2013-06-13  6:28   ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2013-06-13 23:43     ` John Stultz
2013-06-14  0:21       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-12  4:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] vrange: Add new vrange(2) system call John Stultz
2013-06-12  6:48   ` NeilBrown
2013-06-12 18:47     ` John Stultz
2013-06-20 21:05   ` Dhaval Giani
2013-06-12  4:22 ` [PATCH 6/8] vrange: Add GFP_NO_VRANGE allocation flag John Stultz
2013-06-12  4:22 ` [PATCH 7/8] vrange: Add method to purge volatile ranges John Stultz
2013-06-17  7:13   ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-17  7:24     ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-19  4:34   ` Minchan Kim
2013-10-01 14:00     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2013-10-02  1:32       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-12  4:22 ` [PATCH 8/8] vrange: Send SIGBUS when user try to access purged page John Stultz
2013-06-19  4:36   ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-17 16:24 ` [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?) Dhaval Giani
2013-06-18  4:11   ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-18 16:59     ` Dhaval Giani
2013-06-19  4:41       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-19 18:36         ` Dhaval Giani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130613062815.GB5209@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrea@betterlinux.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dgiani@mozilla.com \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mh@glandium.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rlove@google.com \
    --cc=tglek@mozilla.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).