From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, trenn@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org,
jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de,
minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com,
riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [Part1 PATCH v5 10/22] x86, mm, numa: Move two functions calling on successful path later
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:53:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130618005311.GT32663@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371128589-8953-11-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hello,
Does the subject match the patch content? What two functions? The
patch is separating out the actual registration part so that the
discovery part can happen earlier, right?
> Currently, parsing numa info needs to allocate some buffer and need to be
> called after init_mem_mapping. So try to split parsing numa info procedure
> into two steps:
> - The first step will be called before init_mem_mapping, and it
> should not need allocate buffers.
Document the requirement somewhere in the source code?
> - The second step will cantain all the buffer related code and be
> executed later.
>
> At last we will have early_initmem_init() and initmem_init().
Do you mean "eventually" or "in the end" by "at last"?
> This patch implements only the first step.
>
> setup_node_data() and numa_init_array() are only called for successful
> path, so we can move these two callings to x86_numa_init(). That will also
> make numa_init() smaller and more readable.
I find the description somewhat difficult to follow. :(
> -v2: remove online_node_map clear in numa_init(), as it is only
> set in setup_node_data() at last in successful path.
I don't get this. What prevents specific numa init functions (numaq,
x86_acpi, amd...) from updating node_online_map?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-13 13:02 [Part1 PATCH v5 00/22] x86, ACPI, numa: Parse numa info earlier Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 01/22] x86: Change get_ramdisk_{image|size}() to global Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 02/22] x86, microcode: Use common get_ramdisk_{image|size}() Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 03/22] x86, ACPI, mm: Kill max_low_pfn_mapped Tang Chen
2013-06-17 21:04 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-17 21:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-17 23:08 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 04/22] x86, ACPI: Search buffer above 4GB in a second try for acpi initrd table override Tang Chen
2013-06-17 21:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 05/22] x86, ACPI: Increase acpi initrd override tables number limit Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 06/22] x86, ACPI: Split acpi_initrd_override() into find/copy two steps Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 07/22] x86, ACPI: Store override acpi tables phys addr in cpio files info array Tang Chen
2013-06-17 23:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-17 23:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-17 23:52 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 08/22] x86, ACPI: Make acpi_initrd_override_find work with 32bit flat mode Tang Chen
2013-06-18 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 09/22] x86, ACPI: Find acpi tables in initrd early from head_32.S/head64.c Tang Chen
2013-06-18 0:33 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 10/22] x86, mm, numa: Move two functions calling on successful path later Tang Chen
2013-06-18 0:53 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 11/22] x86, mm, numa: Call numa_meminfo_cover_memory() checking early Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:02 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 12/22] x86, mm, numa: Move node_map_pfn_alignment() to x86 Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:08 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 13/22] x86, mm, numa: Use numa_meminfo to check node_map_pfn alignment Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:40 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 14/22] x86, mm, numa: Set memblock nid later Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 15/22] x86, mm, numa: Move node_possible_map setting later Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 16/22] x86, mm, numa: Move numa emulation handling down Tang Chen
2013-06-18 1:58 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-18 6:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-18 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-19 21:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 17/22] x86, ACPI, numa, ia64: split SLIT handling out Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 18/22] x86, mm, numa: Add early_initmem_init() stub Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 19/22] x86, mm: Parse numa info earlier Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 20/22] x86, mm: Add comments for step_size shift Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 21/22] x86, mm: Make init_mem_mapping be able to be called several times Tang Chen
2013-06-13 18:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-13 22:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 5:08 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-13 13:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 22/22] x86, mm, numa: Put pagetable on local node ram for 64bit Tang Chen
2013-06-18 2:03 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 00/22] x86, ACPI, numa: Parse numa info earlier Tejun Heo
2013-06-18 5:47 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-18 17:21 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-20 5:52 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-20 6:17 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-21 9:19 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-21 18:25 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-24 3:51 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-24 7:26 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-24 19:59 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-18 17:10 ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2013-06-18 20:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-19 10:05 ` Vasilis Liaskovitis
2013-06-20 18:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-24 9:40 ` Gu Zheng
2013-06-21 5:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-21 6:06 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-21 6:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-21 6:20 ` Tang Chen
2013-06-21 6:26 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-21 20:18 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130618005311.GT32663@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).