From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx167.postini.com [74.125.245.167])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 495EC6B0034
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:41:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:41:47 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Volatile Ranges (v8?)
Message-ID: <20130619044147.GC10961@bbox>
References: <1371010971-15647-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
 <51BF3827.4060606@mozilla.com>
 <20130618041100.GA3116@bbox>
 <51C091D6.8010608@mozilla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51C091D6.8010608@mozilla.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Dhaval Giani <dgiani@mozilla.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>, Robert Love <rlove@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>, Taras Glek <tglek@mozilla.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>

Hello Dhaval,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:59:02PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On 2013-06-18 12:11 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >Hello Dhaval,
> >
> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:24:07PM -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> >>Hi John,
> >>
> >>I have been giving your git tree a whirl, and in order to simulate a
> >>limited memory environment, I was using memory cgroups.
> >>
> >>The program I was using to test is attached here. It is your test
> >>code, with some changes (changing the syscall interface, reducing
> >>the memory pressure to be generated).
> >>
> >>I trapped it in a memory cgroup with 1MB memory.limit_in_bytes and hit this,
> >>
> >>[  406.207612] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>[  406.207621] kernel BUG at mm/vrange.c:523!
> >>[  406.207626] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> >>[  406.207631] Modules linked in:
> >>[  406.207637] CPU: 0 PID: 1579 Comm: volatile-test Not tainted
> >Thanks for the testing!
> >Does below patch fix your problem?
> 
> Yes it does! Thank you very much for the patch.

Thaks for the confirming.
While I tested it, I found several problems so I just sent fixes as reply
of each [7/8] and [8/8].
Could you test it?


FYI: John, Dhaval

I am working to clean purging mess up so maybe it would need not a few
change for purging part.

Thanks!

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>