From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: do not put a slab to cpu partial list when cpu_partial is 0
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:44:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620014439.GA13026@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51c24c29.425c320a.433e.ffff9d8fSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:26:03AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:52:50PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:00:32PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:33:55PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >> >In free path, we don't check number of cpu_partial, so one slab can
> >> >be linked in cpu partial list even if cpu_partial is 0. To prevent this,
> >> >we should check number of cpu_partial in put_cpu_partial().
> >> >
> >>
> >> How about skip get_partial entirely? put_cpu_partial is called
> >> in two paths, one is during refill cpu partial lists in alloc
> >> slow path, the other is in free slow path. And cpu_partial is 0
> >> just in debug mode.
> >>
> >> - alloc slow path, there is unnecessary to call get_partial
> >> since cpu partial lists won't be used in debug mode.
> >> - free slow patch, new.inuse won't be true in debug mode
> >> which lead to put_cpu_partial won't be called.
> >>
> >
> >In debug mode, put_cpu_partial() can't be called already on both path.
> >But, if we assign 0 to cpu_partial via sysfs, put_cpu_partial() will be called
> >on free slow path. On alloc slow path, it can't be called, because following
> >test in get_partial_node() is always failed.
> >
> >available > s->cpu_partial / 2
>
> Is it always true? We can freeze slab from partial list, and
> s->cpu_partial is 0.
Do you mean node partial list?
At first, acquire_slab() is called for a cpu slab(not cpu partial list)
in get_partial_node(), and then, check above test. In this time, available
is always higher than 0, so, if we assign 0 to s->cpu_partial, we break
the loop and we don't try to get a slab for cpu partial list.
Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li
>
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Wanpeng Li
> >>
> >> >Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> >> >
> >> >diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> >> >index 57707f0..7033b4f 100644
> >> >--- a/mm/slub.c
> >> >+++ b/mm/slub.c
> >> >@@ -1955,6 +1955,9 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
> >> > int pages;
> >> > int pobjects;
> >> >
> >> >+ if (!s->cpu_partial)
> >> >+ return;
> >> >+
> >> > do {
> >> > pages = 0;
> >> > pobjects = 0;
> >> >--
> >> >1.7.9.5
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> >> >the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> >> >see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> >> >Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> >> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> >> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> >> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 6:33 [PATCH] slub: do not put a slab to cpu partial list when cpu_partial is 0 Joonsoo Kim
2013-06-19 8:00 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-19 8:00 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <51c1652d.246e320a.4057.ffffed4fSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-06-19 8:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-06-20 0:26 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-20 0:26 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <51c24c29.425c320a.433e.ffff9d8fSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-06-20 1:44 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-06-20 2:32 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-20 2:32 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-19 14:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-07 15:47 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130620014439.GA13026@lge.com \
--to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).