From: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [3.11 1/4] slub: Make cpu partial slab support configurable V2
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:53:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620025336.GA29876@hacker.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130620015056.GC13026@lge.com>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:50:56AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:29:29PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>
>> > How about maintaining cpu_partial when !CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL?
>> > It makes code less churn and doesn't have much overhead.
>> > At bottom, my implementation with cpu_partial is attached. It uses less '#ifdef'.
>>
>> Looks good. I am fine with it.
>>
>> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
>
>Thanks!
>
>Hello, Pekka.
>I attach a right formatted patch with acked by Christoph and
>signed off by me.
>
>It is based on v3.10-rc6 and top of a patch
>"slub: do not put a slab to cpu partial list when cpu_partial is 0".
>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
>
>-----------------8<-----------------------------------------------
>>From a3257adcff89fd89a7ecb26c1247eec511302807 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:05:52 +0900
>Subject: [PATCH] slub: Make cpu partial slab support configurable
>
>cpu partial support can introduce level of indeterminism that is not
>wanted in certain context (like a realtime kernel). Make it configurable.
>
>This patch is based on Christoph Lameter's
>"slub: Make cpu partial slab support configurable V2".
>
As you know, actually cpu_partial is the maximum number of objects kept
in the per cpu slab and cpu partial lists of a processor instead of
just the maximum number of objects kept in cpu partial lists of a
processor. The allocation will always fallback to slow path if not
config SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL, whether it will lead to more latency?
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
>Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
>diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
>index 2d9b831..a7ec1ec 100644
>--- a/init/Kconfig
>+++ b/init/Kconfig
>@@ -1559,6 +1559,17 @@ config SLOB
>
> endchoice
>
>+config SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
>+ default y
>+ depends on SLUB
>+ bool "SLUB per cpu partial cache"
>+ help
>+ Per cpu partial caches accellerate objects allocation and freeing
>+ that is local to a processor at the price of more indeterminism
>+ in the latency of the free. On overflow these caches will be cleared
>+ which requires the taking of locks that may cause latency spikes.
>+ Typically one would choose no for a realtime system.
>+
> config MMAP_ALLOW_UNINITIALIZED
> bool "Allow mmapped anonymous memory to be uninitialized"
> depends on EXPERT && !MMU
>diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>index 7033b4f..a670d22 100644
>--- a/mm/slub.c
>+++ b/mm/slub.c
>@@ -123,6 +123,15 @@ static inline int kmem_cache_debug(struct kmem_cache *s)
> #endif
> }
>
>+static inline bool kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s)
>+{
>+#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
>+ return !kmem_cache_debug(s);
>+#else
>+ return false;
>+#endif
>+}
>+
> /*
> * Issues still to be resolved:
> *
>@@ -1573,7 +1582,8 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
> put_cpu_partial(s, page, 0);
> stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_NODE);
> }
>- if (kmem_cache_debug(s) || available > s->cpu_partial / 2)
>+ if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s)
>+ || available > s->cpu_partial / 2)
> break;
>
> }
>@@ -1884,6 +1894,7 @@ redo:
> static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s,
> struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
> {
>+#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL, *n2 = NULL;
> struct page *page, *discard_page = NULL;
>
>@@ -1938,6 +1949,7 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s,
> discard_slab(s, page);
> stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
> }
>+#endif
> }
>
> /*
>@@ -1951,6 +1963,7 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s,
> */
> static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
> {
>+#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> struct page *oldpage;
> int pages;
> int pobjects;
>@@ -1990,6 +2003,7 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
> page->next = oldpage;
>
> } while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page) != oldpage);
>+#endif
> }
>
> static inline void flush_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
>@@ -2498,7 +2512,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
> new.inuse--;
> if ((!new.inuse || !prior) && !was_frozen) {
>
>- if (!kmem_cache_debug(s) && !prior)
>+ if (kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s) && !prior)
>
> /*
> * Slab was on no list before and will be partially empty
>@@ -3062,7 +3076,7 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, unsigned long flags)
> * per node list when we run out of per cpu objects. We only fetch 50%
> * to keep some capacity around for frees.
> */
>- if (kmem_cache_debug(s))
>+ if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s))
> s->cpu_partial = 0;
> else if (s->size >= PAGE_SIZE)
> s->cpu_partial = 2;
>@@ -4459,7 +4473,7 @@ static ssize_t cpu_partial_store(struct kmem_cache *s, const char *buf,
> err = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &objects);
> if (err)
> return err;
>- if (objects && kmem_cache_debug(s))
>+ if (objects && !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> s->cpu_partial = objects;
>--
>1.7.9.5
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
>see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130614195500.373711648@linux.com>
2013-06-14 19:55 ` [3.11 2/4] slob: Rework #ifdeffery in slab.h Christoph Lameter
2013-06-14 19:55 ` [3.11 1/4] slub: Make cpu partial slab support configurable V2 Christoph Lameter
2013-06-18 6:35 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-18 14:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-18 15:21 ` Clark Williams
2013-06-18 15:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-25 14:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-01 18:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-02 15:09 ` Clark Williams
2013-07-02 16:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-02 16:53 ` Clark Williams
2013-07-17 2:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-17 7:04 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-07-17 12:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-17 15:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-17 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-17 15:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-19 5:22 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-06-19 14:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-20 1:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-06-20 2:53 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-20 2:53 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
[not found] ` <51c26ebd.e842320a.5dc1.ffffedfcSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-06-20 5:45 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-06-20 5:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-07 16:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-14 20:06 ` [3.11 4/4] Move kmalloc definitions to slab.h Christoph Lameter
2013-06-14 20:06 ` [3.11 3/4] Move kmalloc_node functions to common code Christoph Lameter
2013-06-18 15:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-18 17:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-07-07 16:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-07-08 18:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-19 6:30 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-06-19 14:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-20 1:51 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='20130620025336.GA29876@hacker.(null)' \
--to=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).