From: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.cz,
minchan@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmpressure: implement strict mode
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:03:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130626040331.GA7993@teo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130625175129.7c0d79e1@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:51:29PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> _plus_ higher levels.
>
> This is a problem if the application wants to implement different
> actions for different levels. For example, an application might want
> to release 10% of its cache on level low, 50% on medium and 100% on
> critical. To do this, the application has to register a different fd
> for each event. However, fd low is always going to be notified and
> and all fds are going to be notified on level critical.
>
> Strict mode solves this problem by strictly notifiying the event
> an fd has registered for. It's optional. By default we still notify
> on higher levels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
In the documentation I would add more information about why exactly the
strict mode makes sense.
For example, the non-strict fd listener hooked onto the low level makes
sense for apps that just monitor reclaiming activity (like current Android
Activity Manager), hooking onto 'medium' non-strict mode makes sense for
simple load-balancing logic, and the new strict mode is for the cases when
an application wants to implement some fancy logic as it makes a decision
based on a concrete level.
Otherwise, it looks good.
Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
Thanks!
Anton
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-26 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 21:51 [PATCH] vmpressure: implement strict mode Luiz Capitulino
2013-06-26 0:28 ` Kyungmin Park
2013-06-26 1:12 ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-26 3:20 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-06-26 4:03 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2013-06-26 13:32 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-06-26 7:50 ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-26 7:59 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-26 8:20 ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-26 13:44 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-06-26 18:00 ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-26 8:08 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-26 13:45 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-07-01 8:51 ` Pavel Machek
2013-07-02 15:06 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-07-02 19:47 ` Pavel Machek
2013-07-02 21:55 ` Luiz Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130626040331.GA7993@teo \
--to=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).