linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Hyunhee Kim <hyunhee.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Anton Vorontsov' <anton@enomsg.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rob@landley.net,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	rientjes@google.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	'Minchan Kim' <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vmpressure: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating  a pressure level.
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:37:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130627093721.GC17647@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <009601ce72fd$427eed70$c77cc850$%kim@samsung.com>

On Thu 27-06-13 15:12:10, Hyunhee Kim wrote:
> In vmpressure, the pressure level is calculated based on the ratio
> of how many pages were scanned vs. reclaimed in a given time window.
> However, there is a possibility that "scanned < reclaimed" in such a
> case, when reclaiming ends by fatal signal in shrink_inactive_list.
> So, with this patch, we just return "low" level when "scanned < reclaimed"
> happens not to have userland miss reclaim activity.

Hmm, fatal signal pending on kswapd doesn't make sense to me so it has
to be a direct reclaim path. Does it really make sense to signal LOW
when there is probably a big memory pressure and somebody is killing the
current allocator?

The THP case made sense because nr_scanned is in LRU elements units
while nr_reclaimed is in page units which are different so nr_reclaim
might be higher than nr_scanned (so nr_taken would be more approapriate
for vmpressure).
 
> Signed-off-by: Hyunhee Kim <hyunhee.kim@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmpressure.c |    8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmpressure.c b/mm/vmpressure.c
> index 736a601..8c60cad 100644
> --- a/mm/vmpressure.c
> +++ b/mm/vmpressure.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,14 @@ static enum vmpressure_levels vmpressure_calc_level(unsigned long scanned,
>  	unsigned long pressure;
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * This could happen, in such a case, when reclaiming ends by fatal
> +	 * signal in shrink_inactive_list(). In this case, return
> +	 * VMPRESSURE_LOW not to have userland miss reclaim activity.
> +	 */
> +	if (reclaimed > scanned)
> +		return VMPRESSURE_LOW;
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * We calculate the ratio (in percents) of how many pages were
>  	 * scanned vs. reclaimed in a given time frame (window). Note that
>  	 * time is in VM reclaimer's "ticks", i.e. number of pages
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-27  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17 11:30 [PATCH v3] memcg: event control at vmpressure Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-17 13:15 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-18  6:10   ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-18  8:00     ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-18 11:01       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19 11:25         ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-19 11:59           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-19 11:31         ` [PATCH v4] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-19 12:53           ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-20  2:13             ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-20  2:17             ` [PATCH v5] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-20 12:16               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-21  0:21                 ` [PATCH v6] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21  0:24                   ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21  1:22                     ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-21  9:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-21 11:02                         ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21 11:54                           ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21 12:40                             ` [PATCH v7] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-21 16:27                         ` [PATCH v6] " Minchan Kim
2013-06-21 16:44                           ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-22  0:27                             ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-22  1:28                               ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-26  7:47                               ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-21 22:35                           ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-22  4:36                           ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-22  4:51                             ` Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-22  5:50                               ` [PATCH] memcg: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-22  7:34                                 ` [PATCH] memcg: add interface to specify thresholds of vmpressure Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-25 20:46                                   ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-26  7:39                                   ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-26  7:50                                     ` Kyungmin Park
2013-06-26  8:03                                       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-26  7:35                                 ` [PATCH] memcg: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating Minchan Kim
2013-06-27  6:12                                   ` [PATCH v2] vmpressure: consider "scanned < reclaimed" case when calculating a pressure level Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-27  9:37                                     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-06-27 15:35                                       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-27 16:11                                         ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 18:05                                           ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-28 12:17                                             ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 23:54                                           ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-28  7:43                                             ` [PATCH v3] " Hyunhee Kim
2013-06-28 12:26                                               ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-28 12:24                                             ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Hocko
2013-06-28 13:55                                               ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-28 15:17                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-27 18:33                                     ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-06-26  7:34                               ` [PATCH v6] memcg: event control at vmpressure Minchan Kim
2013-06-26  7:31                             ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-25 16:07                           ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130627093721.GC17647@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@enomsg.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hyunhee.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).