linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] sched: Select a preferred node with the most numa hinting faults
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:44:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130628061428.GB17195@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372257487-9749-4-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>

* Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> [2013-06-26 15:38:02]:

> This patch selects a preferred node for a task to run on based on the
> NUMA hinting faults. This information is later used to migrate tasks
> towards the node during balancing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h |  1 +
>  kernel/sched/core.c   | 10 ++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/fair.c   | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/sched/sched.h  |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 72861b4..ba46a64 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1507,6 +1507,7 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	struct callback_head numa_work;
>  
>  	unsigned long *numa_faults;
> +	int numa_preferred_nid;
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
>  
>  	struct rcu_head rcu;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index f332ec0..019baae 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1593,6 +1593,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
>  	p->numa_scan_seq = p->mm ? p->mm->numa_scan_seq : 0;
>  	p->numa_migrate_seq = p->mm ? p->mm->numa_scan_seq - 1 : 0;
>  	p->numa_scan_period = sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay;
> +	p->numa_preferred_nid = -1;

Though we may not want to inherit faults, I think the tasks generally
share pages with their siblings, parent. So will it make sense to
inherit the preferred node?

>  	p->numa_work.next = &p->numa_work;
>  	p->numa_faults = NULL;
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> @@ -5713,6 +5714,15 @@ enum s_alloc {
>  
>  struct sched_domain_topology_level;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> +
> +/* Set a tasks preferred NUMA node */
> +void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
> +{
> +	p->numa_preferred_nid = nid;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> +
>  typedef struct sched_domain *(*sched_domain_init_f)(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu);
>  typedef const struct cpumask *(*sched_domain_mask_f)(int cpu);
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 904fd6f..f8c3f61 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -793,7 +793,8 @@ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay = 1000;
>  
>  static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> -	int seq;
> +	int seq, nid, max_nid = 0;
> +	unsigned long max_faults = 0;
>  
>  	if (!p->mm)	/* for example, ksmd faulting in a user's mm */
>  		return;
> @@ -802,7 +803,18 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
>  		return;
>  	p->numa_scan_seq = seq;
>  
> -	/* FIXME: Scheduling placement policy hints go here */
> +	/* Find the node with the highest number of faults */
> +	for (nid = 0; nid < nr_node_ids; nid++) {
> +		unsigned long faults = p->numa_faults[nid];
> +		p->numa_faults[nid] >>= 1;
> +		if (faults > max_faults) {
> +			max_faults = faults;
> +			max_nid = nid;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (max_faults && max_nid != p->numa_preferred_nid)
> +		sched_setnuma(p, max_nid);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 9c26d88..65a0cf0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues);
>  #define raw_rq()		(&__raw_get_cpu_var(runqueues))
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> -extern void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int node, int shared);
> +extern void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int nid);
>  static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
>  {
>  	kfree(p->numa_faults);
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-28  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-26 14:37 [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: numa: Document automatic NUMA balancing sysctls Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 15:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 12:22     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  6:08   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  8:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 12:30     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched: Select a preferred node with the most numa hinting faults Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  6:14   ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2013-06-28  8:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:24       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 12:33     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched: Update NUMA hinting faults once per scan Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  6:32   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  9:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-27 14:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:00     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 16:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:01     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 16:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:45     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 15:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28  8:11   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  9:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:07       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 10:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:51         ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 17:14           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 17:34             ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 17:44               ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:54     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02 12:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-02 16:29     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02 18:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-06  6:44       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-06 10:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-02 18:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03  9:50     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 15:28       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched: Split accounting of NUMA hinting faults that pass two-stage filter Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 14:00     ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28  7:00   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28  9:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:12       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 10:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 14:29           ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 15:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched: Increase NUMA PTE scanning when a new preferred node is selected Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:59 ` [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-01  5:39   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-01  8:43     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02  5:28       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-02  7:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-02  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130628061428.GB17195@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).