From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:51:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130628135114.GY1875@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130628100723.GC8362@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:37:23PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * can_migrate_task - may task p from runqueue rq be migrated to this_cpu?
> > > > */
> > > > @@ -3945,10 +3977,14 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * Aggressive migration if:
> > > > - * 1) task is cache cold, or
> > > > - * 2) too many balance attempts have failed.
> > > > + * 1) destination numa is preferred
> > > > + * 2) task is cache cold, or
> > > > + * 3) too many balance attempts have failed.
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > + if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env))
> > > > + return 1;
> > >
> > > Shouldnt this be under tsk_cache_hot check?
> > >
> > > If the task is cache hot, then we would have to update the corresponding schedstat
> > > metrics.
> >
> > No; you want migrate_degrades_locality() to be like task_hot(). You want
> > to _always_ migrate tasks towards better locality irrespective of local
> > cache hotness.
> >
>
> Yes, I understand that numa should have more priority over cache.
> But the schedstats will not be updated about whether the task was hot or
> cold.
>
> So lets say the task was cache hot but numa wants it to move, then we
> should certainly move it but we should update the schedstats to mention that we
> moved a cache hot task.
>
> Something akin to this.
>
> tsk_cache_hot = task_hot(p, env->src_rq->clock_task, env->sd);
> if (tsk_cache_hot) {
> if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env) ||
> (env->sd->nr_balance_failed > env->sd->cache_nice_tries)) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
> schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_hot_gained[env->idle]);
> schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_forced_migrations);
> #endif
> return 1;
> }
> schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_failed_migrations_hot);
> return 0;
> }
> return 1;
>
Thanks. Is this acceptable?
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b3848e0..c3a153e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4088,8 +4088,13 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
* 3) too many balance attempts have failed.
*/
- if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env))
+ if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env)) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
+ schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_hot_gained[env->idle]);
+ schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_forced_migrations);
+#endif
return 1;
+ }
tsk_cache_hot = task_hot(p, env->src_rq->clock_task, env->sd);
if (!tsk_cache_hot)
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-28 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-26 14:37 [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: numa: Document automatic NUMA balancing sysctls Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 12:22 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 6:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 12:30 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched: Select a preferred node with the most numa hinting faults Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 6:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 12:33 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched: Update NUMA hinting faults once per scan Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 6:32 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-27 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:00 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 16:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:01 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:45 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 8:11 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:07 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:51 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2013-06-28 17:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 17:34 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 17:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:54 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02 12:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-02 16:29 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02 18:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-06 6:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-06 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-02 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 15:28 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched: Split accounting of NUMA hinting faults that pass two-stage filter Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 14:00 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 7:00 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 10:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-06-28 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 14:29 ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-28 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 14:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched: Increase NUMA PTE scanning when a new preferred node is selected Mel Gorman
2013-06-27 14:59 ` [PATCH 0/6] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-28 13:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-01 5:39 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-01 8:43 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-02 5:28 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-02 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-02 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130628135114.GY1875@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).